Skip to content

Are Indication and Use the Same?: Clarifying a Key Distinction in Pharmacology

4 min read

Pharmacology terminology can be confusing, with a recent study showing a significant percentage of patients misunderstand key medical terms. So, are indication and use the same? They are not, and understanding their distinction is crucial for both healthcare professionals and patients to ensure safe and effective medication management.

Quick Summary

Indication refers to the FDA-approved medical condition a drug is intended to treat, while use describes how a physician actually prescribes it, which can include off-label purposes.

Key Points

  • Indication vs. Use: Indication is the specific, regulatory-approved condition a drug treats, while use is the actual manner in which a physician prescribes it.

  • FDA Approval: A drug's FDA-approved indication is based on rigorous clinical trials proving safety and efficacy for that specific purpose.

  • Off-Label Prescribing: Physicians can legally prescribe a drug for an unapproved, or 'off-label,' use based on clinical judgment or emerging evidence.

  • Manufacturer vs. Physician Role: Manufacturers can only market drugs for approved indications, but physicians are free to prescribe based on their expertise and the patient's best interest.

  • Patient Impact: Understanding this distinction is crucial for patients, as it can affect insurance coverage, consent, and knowledge of potential risks.

In This Article

The Fundamental Difference Between Indication and Use

In the simplest terms, an indication is the why—the specific disease or condition for which a drug has been officially approved. Use is the how—the way a drug is prescribed by a physician in clinical practice. This distinction is significant because while a drug's indication is a regulatory, black-and-white designation, its use in the real world can be much broader and more nuanced. Regulatory bodies, like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), are responsible for approving indications, but they do not regulate how physicians ultimately choose to prescribe approved medications.

The Regulatory Foundation: FDA-Approved Indications

An FDA-approved indication is the result of a rigorous, multi-phase clinical trial process that proves a drug's safety and efficacy for a specific disease or condition. For example, the indication for insulin is diabetes, meaning it has been officially approved to treat this condition. A drug can have multiple indications if manufacturers conduct and submit the necessary studies to the FDA for each condition. All approved, or "labeled," indications are listed on the drug's package insert, which serves as a primary source of information for healthcare providers. Pharmaceutical companies can legally market a drug only for its FDA-approved indications.

The Clinical Reality: Labeled vs. Off-Label Use

Once a drug has received FDA approval for at least one indication, a physician can legally prescribe it for other conditions, a practice known as off-label use. This is a common and legal practice in medicine and is supported by a physician's clinical judgment and professional expertise. Off-label prescribing may be influenced by promising, albeit less extensive, research, established clinical practice, or when approved treatments have failed. For instance, a drug approved for depression might be used off-label to treat a different anxiety disorder if evidence suggests its effectiveness. Physicians are ethically and legally obligated to inform patients when a medication is being prescribed for an off-label use.

The Role of Evidence and Clinical Judgment

Off-label prescribing is not a practice without a foundation. It is often supported by clinical research, expert consensus, and evidence-based guidelines developed by medical professional societies. For example, in oncology, off-label drug use is common and often considered the standard of care for certain types of cancer. However, the evidence supporting off-label uses may be less extensive or robust than that for FDA-approved indications, highlighting the importance of physician expertise and communication with the patient.

The Critical Distinctions: Indication vs. Use Explained

Aspect Indication Use
Scope Refers to the specific, regulatory-approved disease or condition. Describes the actual, real-world prescribing and application of the drug.
Basis Supported by extensive, FDA-reviewed clinical trial data proving safety and efficacy. Supported by clinical judgment, professional guidelines, and emerging research.
Approval Must be specifically approved by a regulatory body like the FDA. Does not require regulatory approval for each application; rests on the prescribing doctor's discretion.
Regulatory Body The FDA (in the US) or equivalent body oversees and approves indications. The prescribing physician is the authority for the specific use.
Marketing Pharmaceutical companies can legally market the drug for its approved indications. Manufacturers cannot promote or market the drug for off-label purposes.

Examples to Clarify the Concepts

  • Example: Escitalopram
    • Indication: The FDA-approved indication for escitalopram (brand name Lexapro) is for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder.
    • Use (Off-label): A doctor might prescribe escitalopram for panic disorder, as it is supported by clinical guidelines and evidence, even though it lacks an FDA-approved indication for that specific condition.
  • Example: Insulin
    • Indication: The FDA-approved indication for insulin is to lower blood glucose in patients with diabetes.
    • Use (Labeled): The vast majority of insulin use is for its approved indication, representing a clear alignment between the official indication and the clinical application.

Factors Influencing Off-Label Prescribing

Several factors can lead to a physician prescribing a drug off-label:

  • Lack of FDA-approved alternatives: In some cases, especially for rare diseases, there may be no approved medication, making off-label use the only option.
  • Clinical experience and emerging research: A body of evidence might accumulate demonstrating a drug's effectiveness for an unapproved condition, even without formal FDA review.
  • Cost-effectiveness: A physician might choose a cheaper, older drug for an off-label use over a more expensive, newly approved alternative, if both are considered effective.

Why Understanding the Distinction Matters for Patients

Knowing the difference between indication and use empowers patients to be better advocates for their own health. Key reasons include:

  • Informed Consent: Patients can have an informed conversation with their doctor about why a medication is being prescribed, especially if it's for an off-label use.
  • Insurance Coverage: Many insurance companies will only cover drugs for their FDA-approved indications. Patients might have to pay out-of-pocket for off-label uses unless the prescribing is supported by specific compendia or guidelines.
  • Understanding Risks: While off-label uses can be safe and effective, they may be less studied, and the risks might not be as well-defined as for approved indications.

Conclusion

In the world of pharmacology, indication and use are not the same. Indication is the strictly defined, FDA-approved purpose for a drug, backed by extensive research. Use is the broader, clinical application determined by a physician's judgment, which may include off-label prescribing. While both are legitimate aspects of medical practice, their distinction affects regulation, marketing, and patient care. By understanding this key difference, patients and healthcare providers can navigate medication choices with greater clarity and confidence, ensuring treatments are both appropriate and well-informed.

Resources

For more information on drug indications and off-label prescribing, please visit the National Cancer Institute's guide on the topic: Off-Label Drug Use in Cancer Treatment.

Frequently Asked Questions

The primary difference is regulatory status. The indication is the official, FDA-approved purpose for which a drug can be legally marketed, while the use is the actual medical application prescribed by a doctor, which may or may not be the same as the official indication.

No, off-label drug use is not illegal. Once a drug has been approved for at least one indication, physicians have the professional discretion to prescribe it for other conditions if they believe it is medically appropriate for the patient.

Doctors may prescribe a drug off-label for several reasons, including a lack of an approved alternative for a specific condition, existing clinical evidence supporting its effectiveness, or their own professional experience.

No, pharmaceutical companies are legally prohibited from marketing or promoting their drugs for any off-label indications that have not been specifically approved by the FDA.

Insurance companies often base coverage on a drug's FDA-approved indication. While some off-label uses may be covered if supported by medical compendia, patients should be aware that they might need to pay out-of-pocket if the use is not covered.

You should be informed that the use is off-label and why your doctor recommends it. Discuss the available evidence supporting the treatment, potential risks, and any implications for insurance coverage to ensure you can provide informed consent.

Not necessarily. While off-label uses may have less extensive regulatory-reviewed data, they can still be effective and safe, especially when supported by clinical practice guidelines. However, the evidence is often less comprehensive than for approved indications.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.