Skip to content

Is Atripla Discontinued? A Look at Its Status and Modern Alternatives

4 min read

Approved by the FDA in 2006, Atripla was once considered a game-changer as the first complete single-tablet regimen for HIV treatment. For those currently taking it or researching options, questions have arisen because the brand name is no longer actively marketed. Is Atripla discontinued, and what does this mean for patients managing HIV?.

Quick Summary

The brand name Atripla has been discontinued due to declining market demand, though a generic version is still available. This is primarily because newer, better-tolerated, and often more effective HIV medications have emerged, offering significant advantages.

Key Points

  • Brand Name Discontinued: The brand-name drug Atripla was officially discontinued by its manufacturer, Gilead Sciences, due to decreased market demand.

  • Generic Version Available: A generic equivalent containing the same active ingredients (efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) is still available.

  • Commercial, Not Safety, Decision: The brand name was withdrawn for commercial reasons, not because of new safety or efficacy concerns.

  • Newer and Better Alternatives: Since Atripla's approval, newer antiretroviral therapies (ART) like Biktarvy and Dovato have been developed with better safety profiles and fewer side effects.

  • Significant Side Effects: Atripla is known for central nervous system (CNS) side effects from its efavirenz component and a higher risk of kidney and bone density issues due to its TDF component compared to modern alternatives.

  • Consult a Doctor: Patients currently on generic Atripla should discuss treatment options with their healthcare provider to consider switching to a newer regimen for potential improvements in tolerability and long-term health.

In This Article

The Story Behind Atripla's Discontinuation

The brand name Atripla was officially discontinued by its manufacturer, Gilead Sciences, for commercial reasons. In the U.S., this occurred at the end of 2021, and in the European Union, the marketing authorization was withdrawn in November 2021. It is important to note that this discontinuation was a business decision and was not related to new safety or efficacy concerns with the medication itself.

Atripla, a fixed-dose combination of efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), paved the way for convenient, once-daily single-tablet regimens (STRs) for HIV. However, the landscape of HIV treatment has advanced significantly since its 2006 approval. Newer therapies have since been developed that offer improved safety profiles, better tolerability, and fewer drug interactions, leading to a decline in demand for Atripla.

Is the Generic Version of Atripla Available?

Despite the brand name being discontinued, the medication is far from gone. A generic version, containing the same active ingredients—efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate—remains readily available. This generic formulation works identically to the original brand name and continues to be an effective treatment for many people with HIV. For many patients, especially those who have been stable on the regimen for years, staying on the generic version is a viable option, often at a significantly reduced cost compared to the original brand.

Understanding the Shift to Newer HIV Therapies

The discontinuation of branded Atripla reflects a shift towards more modern and refined antiretroviral therapies (ART). While Atripla was a revolutionary step forward in its time, it had notable limitations that newer drugs have addressed. The most significant drawbacks were associated with the efavirenz and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) components:

  • Central Nervous System (CNS) Side Effects: The efavirenz in Atripla can cause a range of neuropsychiatric side effects, such as dizziness, insomnia, and vivid or unusual dreams. While many patients adapted over time, these side effects led many others to seek alternative treatments.
  • Kidney and Bone Health Risks: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), one of the drugs in Atripla, is linked to a higher risk of kidney problems and decreased bone mineral density compared to newer forms of tenofovir.
  • Food Restrictions: To mitigate CNS side effects, Atripla must be taken on an empty stomach, preferably at bedtime, which can be an inconvenience for some patients.

In response to these issues, pharmaceutical research yielded newer options with better profiles. For example, some modern regimens use tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) instead of TDF, which carries a lower risk of kidney and bone toxicity. Other newer treatments replace efavirenz with better-tolerated integrase inhibitors, which are often associated with fewer CNS side effects.

Atripla (Generic) vs. Modern HIV Treatment

Feature Atripla (Generic) Biktarvy Dovato Symfi (Generic)
Active Ingredients Efavirenz, emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) Bictegravir, emtricitabine, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) Dolutegravir, lamivudine Efavirenz, lamivudine, tenofovir
Drug Class NNRTI + NRTIs INSTI + NRTIs INSTI + NRTI NNRTI + NRTIs
Administration Once daily, on an empty stomach (preferably at bedtime) Once daily, with or without food Once daily, with or without food Once daily, on an empty stomach
Key Differences Higher risk of CNS side effects; potential for kidney and bone issues due to TDF Improved kidney/bone safety (TAF), fewer CNS side effects Only two drugs in one tablet; not for use with HIV/HBV coinfection Very similar to generic Atripla, but can cause similar CNS issues; Symfi Lo is a lower-dose version
Current Guideline Status No longer a first-choice regimen Recommended as a first-choice regimen Recommended as a first-choice regimen (with specific provisos) No longer a first-choice regimen

A Patient's Guide to Transitioning from Atripla

For patients currently on Atripla, either as the brand name (if still available in certain regions) or its generic version, a key step is to consult with a healthcare provider. While the generic continues to be a valid treatment, discussing a potential switch to a newer therapy may be beneficial. Your doctor can evaluate your medical history and specific needs to determine if an alternative might improve your quality of life by reducing side effects or decreasing long-term risks to kidney and bone health.

Factors to consider when discussing treatment options include:

  • Side Effect Profile: If you experience persistent neuropsychiatric side effects, transitioning to a regimen without efavirenz, such as Biktarvy or Dovato, could be a significant improvement.
  • Kidney and Bone Health: For patients with existing or high-risk for kidney or bone conditions, switching from a TDF-based regimen to a TAF-based one may be prudent.
  • Convenience: Taking medication on an empty stomach at a specific time of day can be burdensome. Newer alternatives like Biktarvy can be taken with or without food, simplifying the daily routine.
  • Overall Health: As with all HIV treatment, maintaining adherence is crucial for viral suppression. Your provider will help you weigh the pros and cons of switching based on your individual needs and potential for drug interactions.

Ultimately, the choice of medication is a personal decision made in consultation with a medical professional. For long-time users who are stable and tolerate the generic well, remaining on it is perfectly acceptable. For others, the opportunity to upgrade to a newer, more tolerable medication may be worth exploring.

Conclusion

To answer the question, "Is Atripla discontinued?"—yes, the brand name is no longer marketed due to its replacement by superior therapies, but the generic formulation remains available. The development of newer single-tablet regimens has provided improved safety profiles and greater convenience, moving HIV treatment away from older drug combinations. While the generic version of Atripla is still an effective option, many patients and doctors are shifting towards modern alternatives like Biktarvy and Dovato, which offer a better-tolerated and often safer approach to long-term HIV management. The evolution of ART, beginning with Atripla's groundbreaking introduction, continues to improve the quality of life for those living with HIV.

For more information on the history and alternatives to Atripla, you can visit Aidsmap's resource on HIV medications.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, the brand-name Atripla has been permanently discontinued and is no longer available in the U.S. or the EU. However, a generic version is still in production.

Yes, the generic version contains the identical active ingredients—efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate—and works the same way as the brand name Atripla.

The manufacturer discontinued the brand name for commercial reasons, primarily due to declining demand. The market for HIV treatment has evolved with newer, often better-tolerated, and more effective medications.

Common side effects include dizziness, unusual dreams, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, and depression. These are largely associated with the efavirenz component.

Numerous newer alternatives exist, including single-tablet regimens like Biktarvy, Dovato, Genvoya, and Odefsey, which offer improved side-effect profiles.

That depends on your individual health needs and tolerance of the generic medication. Many patients who are stable on the generic choose to stay, but if you experience significant side effects or have risks related to kidney or bone health, discussing a switch with your doctor is advisable.

No, Atripla was never approved or intended for use as PrEP. While it contains some of the same components as PrEP medications like Truvada, it has not been studied for HIV prevention.

Yes, the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in generic Atripla has been linked to a greater risk of kidney damage and bone loss compared to the tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) found in newer medications like Biktarvy.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.