Skip to content

Is Cosentyx or Taltz Better? A Comprehensive Comparison

5 min read

Approximately 125 million people worldwide suffer from psoriasis, and many may wonder, 'is Cosentyx or Taltz better?'. Both are powerful biologic medications that treat similar autoimmune conditions by blocking the inflammatory protein interleukin-17A, but they have key differences in efficacy, dosing, and approved uses.

Quick Summary

Cosentyx (secukinumab) and Taltz (ixekizumab) are IL-17A inhibitors for psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and more. Key differences exist in approved indications, dosing, and common side effects, with the best choice depending on the specific patient and condition.

Key Points

  • Mechanism is Identical: Both Cosentyx and Taltz are IL-17A inhibitors, meaning they block the same inflammatory protein to reduce symptoms.

  • Approved Uses Differ: Cosentyx is approved for a slightly broader range of conditions than Taltz, including hidradenitis suppurativa and a wider pediatric population.

  • Efficacy Can Vary: Studies suggest potential differences in onset and long-term effectiveness, though both are considered highly effective in treating their shared indications.

  • Side Effect Profiles Have Subtle Differences: Taltz is more associated with injection site reactions, while Cosentyx is more linked to diarrhea and nasopharyngitis.

  • Dosing Schedule and Devices May Vary: Taltz typically requires a single injection per dose during maintenance, whereas Cosentyx pens require two, although Cosentyx also offers an IV option.

  • Latex Allergy is a Factor: Cosentyx pens and syringes have a removable cap containing latex, a crucial consideration for those with latex sensitivities.

In This Article

Understanding IL-17A Inhibitors: Cosentyx vs. Taltz

Cosentyx (secukinumab) and Taltz (ixekizumab) are both modern biologic medications known as interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitors. Their primary function is to target and block IL-17A, a pro-inflammatory protein that plays a significant role in autoimmune conditions like psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. While they share this fundamental mechanism, differences in molecular structure, indications, and clinical performance can make one a more suitable option than the other for an individual patient. Deciding which is better is a complex medical decision that requires a detailed look at the specifics of each drug.

Approved Indications and Disease Scope

While both medications are approved to treat moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and active psoriatic arthritis in adults, their full range of uses is not identical.

  • Cosentyx (secukinumab): This medication has a broader range of approved indications from the FDA. It treats plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (including children aged 2 and older), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA), enthesitis-related arthritis, and moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa in adults.
  • Taltz (ixekizumab): Taltz is approved for plaque psoriasis (adults and children 6+), active psoriatic arthritis (adults), active ankylosing spondylitis, and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. While its scope is slightly more focused than Cosentyx's, its applications overlap significantly in key areas.

Efficacy and Speed of Action

Clinical trials have evaluated the effectiveness of both drugs, though few direct head-to-head studies exist. Patient and physician experiences also provide valuable insight. The choice often comes down to balancing a rapid onset of action with long-term effectiveness.

  • For Plaque Psoriasis: Some clinical data suggests Taltz may offer a numerically higher cumulative number of days with completely clear skin over one year for adult patients. In contrast, other data has indicated Cosentyx may have a more rapid onset of action. However, both have demonstrated excellent, long-term effectiveness.
  • For Psoriatic Arthritis: One study suggested that Taltz may offer more quality-adjusted life-years at a slightly lower cost, but overall efficacy is considered similar. Patient response can vary, and what works well for one person may not for another.

Dosing, Administration, and Patient Convenience

The regimen for receiving these medications can differ, impacting patient convenience and preference. Both are typically administered via subcutaneous injection.

  • Taltz: The initial dose for plaque psoriasis is two 80mg injections, followed by one 80mg injection every two weeks for a few months, and then every four weeks for maintenance. The standard single injection during maintenance can be more convenient for some. Taltz can also be stored outside the refrigerator for up to five days, offering more flexibility.
  • Cosentyx: The standard 300mg dose for psoriasis via autoinjector or prefilled syringe requires two separate 150mg injections during the loading phase and maintenance. Cosentyx also has an intravenous (IV) formulation option administered in a healthcare provider's office. The autoinjector's cap contains natural rubber latex, which is an important consideration for latex-sensitive patients.

Side Effects and Safety Profile

The overall safety profiles are quite similar, with the most common side effects being upper respiratory infections. However, some differences in specific adverse events have been noted.

Commonly reported side effects:

  • Cosentyx: Nasopharyngitis, diarrhea, oral herpes, and urticaria.
  • Taltz: Injection site reactions (pain, redness), nausea, and tinea infections.

Important safety considerations:

  • Both biologics carry a risk of serious infections and are associated with an increased risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
  • It's crucial for patients to monitor for symptoms like diarrhea, abdominal pain, fever, or blood in the stool and report them to their doctor.

Head-to-Head Comparison Table

Feature Cosentyx (secukinumab) Taltz (ixekizumab)
Mechanism Targets and blocks IL-17A Targets and blocks IL-17A
Approved Indications (Adults) Plaque Psoriasis, PsA, AS, nr-axSpA, Enthesitis-related arthritis, Hidradenitis suppurativa Plaque Psoriasis, PsA, AS, nr-axSpA
Approved Indications (Pediatric) Plaque Psoriasis (6+), PsA (2+), Enthesitis-related arthritis (4+) Plaque Psoriasis (6+)
Onset of Action Potentially more rapid for psoriasis Excellent, possibly better cumulative long-term results for psoriasis
Common Side Effects Diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, oral herpes Injection site reactions, nausea
Dosing Frequency (Maintenance) Every 4 weeks (subcutaneous) Every 4 weeks (subcutaneous)
Formulations Prefilled syringe, Sensoready pen, IV infusion Prefilled syringe, Autoinjector
Latex Warning Removable cap on pens/syringes contains latex Does not contain latex

Making the Right Choice

Choosing between Cosentyx and Taltz is a nuanced decision that should be made in close consultation with a healthcare provider. There is no universally "better" option, as the best fit depends on individual patient factors. Here are some factors to consider:

  • Specific Condition: If the patient has a condition like hidradenitis suppurativa or requires pediatric treatment outside the shared age range, Cosentyx may be the only option.
  • Efficacy Experience: Patients with a history of using biologics, or those with a specific response pattern, might lean towards one drug's effectiveness profile. Some patients respond better to one medication over another, even within the same class.
  • Convenience and Dosage: The dosing regimen and number of injections per dose could influence a patient's preference. Taltz typically requires only one injection during maintenance, while Cosentyx pens require two.
  • Side Effect Profile: A patient with a history of gastrointestinal issues might prefer Taltz, as Cosentyx is more associated with diarrhea. Conversely, someone with sensitive skin or concerns about injection site pain might prefer Cosentyx.
  • Other Health Concerns: The presence of a latex allergy is a clear differentiator if the patient uses a Cosentyx pen or prefilled syringe. The risk of IBD with both medications also needs to be carefully discussed.
  • Cost and Insurance Coverage: These high-cost biologics are heavily influenced by insurance coverage. The out-of-pocket costs and availability through patient assistance programs will be a significant factor for many.

Conclusion

Cosentyx and Taltz are both effective IL-17A inhibitors for treating inflammatory conditions, particularly plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. The question of which is better is determined by a patient's specific diagnosis, medical history, lifestyle, and how they respond to treatment. Cosentyx offers a wider range of approved indications, while Taltz may provide slightly better long-term skin clearance in some psoriasis studies. Practical differences, such as the number of injections per dose and latex content in the autoinjector, can also affect the decision. Ultimately, patients should have an in-depth conversation with their healthcare provider to weigh the pros and cons and make an informed decision based on their unique circumstances.

For more detailed prescribing information and clinical trial data, refer to the official FDA resources for each drug.

Frequently Asked Questions

Both Cosentyx (secukinumab) and Taltz (ixekizumab) are biologics that work as interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitors. Their main difference lies in their specific molecular structure, which can slightly affect their binding affinity and how an individual patient responds to them.

Cosentyx has a wider range of approved indications from the FDA than Taltz. In addition to conditions they both treat like psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, Cosentyx is also approved for hidradenitis suppurativa in adults and has wider pediatric use.

Some clinical data suggests Cosentyx may have a more rapid onset of action for psoriasis than Taltz. However, patient response can vary, and both are considered highly effective in the long term.

While both share a similar safety profile, some side effect variations exist. Taltz has a higher incidence of injection site reactions and nausea, while Cosentyx is more likely to cause diarrhea and nasopharyngitis.

For maintenance dosing, both are typically taken every four weeks. However, the number of injections per dose differs: Taltz usually requires one injection after the initial phase, while Cosentyx pens typically require two.

The convenience depends on patient needs. Taltz may be more convenient for some due to a single injection per dose during maintenance. Cosentyx offers an intravenous option for those who prefer to receive treatment in a clinic.

Taltz injections do not contain latex. In contrast, the removable cap of the Cosentyx pen and prefilled syringe contains natural rubber latex, which is a key consideration for patients with latex sensitivity.

The retail cost of biologics is very high, but the actual out-of-pocket expense depends heavily on insurance plans and access to patient assistance programs. Costs can vary, so it's best to consult with your insurance provider.

Clinical studies suggest both are effective for psoriatic arthritis. Some data indicates Taltz might offer more quality-adjusted life-years, but individual response is the most important factor.

Both Cosentyx and Taltz are approved for ankylosing spondylitis. The choice between them for this condition depends on a patient's individual response, tolerance, and other medical factors, similar to psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.