Skip to content

Is Dorsogluteal Still Used? A Modern Perspective on Injection Site Safety

3 min read

Despite being a traditional site for intramuscular injections for decades, medical literature began documenting associated injuries as early as the 1920s. This historical practice has now shifted dramatically, with major health organizations largely advising against its use. So, is the dorsogluteal still used by healthcare providers today, and what are the safer alternatives?

Quick Summary

The dorsogluteal site for intramuscular injections is largely discouraged due to significant risks, including potential sciatic nerve damage, nerve injury, and unreliable medication absorption. Healthcare providers now favor safer alternatives, such as the ventrogluteal, vastus lateralis, and deltoid sites, following evidence-based guidelines.

Key Points

  • Historically Popular, Now Discouraged: The dorsogluteal (DG) site was traditionally used for intramuscular (IM) injections but is now widely discouraged by healthcare experts due to significant safety risks.

  • High Risk of Nerve Injury: The DG site's close proximity to the large sciatic nerve poses a significant risk of damage, which can result in foot drop, chronic pain, or paralysis.

  • Ineffective Drug Delivery: The unpredictable thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer at the DG site often prevents medication from reaching the muscle, leading to poor absorption and potential complications like abscesses.

  • Ventrogluteal is the Safer Alternative: The ventrogluteal (VG) site on the hip is the modern standard of care, offering a larger, thicker muscle mass that is far from major nerves and vessels.

  • Other Valid Sites Exist: For different patient populations and injection volumes, the vastus lateralis (thigh) and deltoid (arm) muscles are also safe and effective alternatives.

  • Practice Adherence is Key: While some limited use of the DG site may persist, modern clinical practice and ongoing training emphasize the use of safer, evidence-based alternatives for all intramuscular injections.

In This Article

The Decline of the Dorsogluteal Injection Site

Historically, the dorsogluteal (DG) site was commonly used for intramuscular (IM) injections due to its perceived large muscle mass. However, significant safety concerns have emerged over time, leading to a shift in modern healthcare towards recommending safer alternatives.

Anatomical Risks: The Threat to Nerves and Vessels

The primary risk of the dorsogluteal site is its closeness to the sciatic nerve. Damage to this nerve during injection can cause foot drop, sensory loss, chronic pain, and even paralysis. The superior gluteal nerve and artery are also located in this area, posing additional risks.

Ineffective Absorption: The Subcutaneous Tissue Problem

Another issue with the DG site is the likelihood of injecting into subcutaneous fat instead of muscle, especially in older adults or those with higher BMI. This can result in slower and less predictable drug absorption, reducing effectiveness and increasing the risk of localized pain, inflammation, and abscesses.

The Modern Standard: Safer Alternatives

Modern guidelines advocate for safer IM injection sites due to the risks of the DG site.

The Ventrogluteal (VG) Site

The ventrogluteal site is now considered the preferred and safest site for most IM injections in all age groups. It is located away from major nerves and blood vessels, has a thinner fat layer and thicker muscle than the DG site, leading to better absorption, and is associated with less pain.

Other Recommended Sites

  • Deltoid Muscle: Suitable for smaller volumes and commonly used for vaccinations in adults.
  • Vastus Lateralis Muscle: A good alternative for adults and the preferred site for infants and young children, located away from major nerves and vessels.

Comparison of Dorsogluteal and Ventrogluteal Injection Sites

Feature Dorsogluteal (Traditional) Ventrogluteal (Modern Standard)
Sciatic Nerve Proximity High risk due to proximity (mean distance ~9 cm). Low risk; located far from major nerves (mean distance ~18 cm).
Injection Failure Rate (Older Adults) High (up to 43.86% risk of subcutaneous injection). Lower (around 15.20% risk of subcutaneous injection).
Subcutaneous Fat Layer Variable and often thick, compromising absorption. Generally thinner and more consistent, ensuring intramuscular delivery.
Risk of Bone Contact Can occur with standard needles, especially in frail or older adults. Negligible risk with standard needle lengths.
Patient Pain/Comfort Consistently associated with higher reported pain levels. Associated with lower pain levels, making it more comfortable.
Risk of Abscess/Hematoma Higher documented risk. Lower rates of complications.
Landmarking Traditional quadrant method is less reliable due to anatomical variation. Utilizes reliable, palpable bony landmarks (V-method).

Factors Influencing Injection Site Selection

Healthcare providers consider factors like patient age, body composition, injection volume, and medication type when choosing an injection site. The Z-track method is also often used to prevent medication leakage.

Is Dorsogluteal Still Used in Clinical Practice?

Despite evidence and guidelines, the dorsogluteal site may still be used by some practitioners, sometimes out of familiarity. Some mental health settings have historically used it, though efforts are being made to ensure safer use in specific cases. However, this practice is not widespread and goes against current recommendations. Ongoing education and adherence to guidelines from organizations like the CDC are crucial for patient safety.

Conclusion

The use of the dorsogluteal site for intramuscular injections is largely being replaced by safer alternatives. Its risks, particularly regarding sciatic nerve injury and unpredictable absorption, make it less favorable compared to sites like the ventrogluteal, vastus lateralis, and deltoid. While its use may not be entirely eliminated, modern medical practice emphasizes evidence-based guidelines and patient safety, prioritizing safer injection sites. Patients are encouraged to discuss injection site options with their healthcare providers to ensure the best care.

A comprehensive resource on best practices for intramuscular injections can be found at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-best-practices/vaccine-administration.html.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main risks include potential damage to the sciatic nerve, leading to paralysis or chronic pain, and the high chance of injecting medication into subcutaneous fat rather than muscle, which reduces effectiveness and can cause abscesses or granulomas.

The ventrogluteal site is located far from major nerves and blood vessels, has a consistently thick muscle mass, and a thinner subcutaneous fat layer. This provides a wider margin of safety, ensures proper drug absorption, and is associated with less pain for the patient.

While the practice is now largely discouraged and safer alternatives are standard, some providers may still use the dorsogluteal site under specific, carefully evaluated circumstances, though this is becoming less common. You can and should discuss injection site options with your provider.

The main alternatives are the ventrogluteal (side hip) site, the vastus lateralis (thigh) muscle, and the deltoid (arm) muscle. Each site has specific recommendations for patient age and injection volume.

A patient's BMI and fat distribution are critical factors. For individuals with higher BMIs, the thickness of the subcutaneous fat can hinder medication from reaching the muscle, particularly at the dorsogluteal site. In these cases, longer needles or a more reliable site like the ventrogluteal is necessary.

No, studies show that injections into the ventrogluteal site are often reported as less painful than those in the dorsogluteal or vastus lateralis sites.

The Z-track technique is used for intramuscular injections to prevent medication from leaking back into the subcutaneous tissue. It is often recommended for deep muscle injections, particularly those using irritating solutions, and is commonly used with the ventrogluteal site.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.