Skip to content

Is Inpefa the same as Jardiance?: A Comprehensive Pharmacological Comparison

5 min read

Both Inpefa and Jardiance are part of the SGLT inhibitor class, but a key pharmacological distinction lies in their targets. The short answer to the question, 'Is Inpefa the same as Jardiance?' is no, but a deeper look reveals why these medications, despite sharing some benefits, are distinct.

Quick Summary

While both Inpefa (sotagliflozin) and Jardiance (empagliflozin) are SGLT inhibitors used for heart failure, they differ significantly. Inpefa targets both SGLT1 and SGLT2, while Jardiance is a selective SGLT2 inhibitor, affecting different areas of the body.

Key Points

  • Dual vs. Selective Inhibition: Inpefa is a dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitor, acting in both the kidneys and the gut, while Jardiance is a selective SGLT2 inhibitor, acting only in the kidneys.

  • Different Side Effects: Inpefa's dual action can cause diarrhea, a side effect not typically associated with Jardiance.

  • Varying Indications: Jardiance is explicitly approved for Type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and CKD, while Inpefa's primary indication is heart failure, regardless of diabetes status.

  • Unique Study Populations: Inpefa has been studied and approved for patients with worsening heart failure, providing a specific therapeutic angle.

  • Heart Failure Ejection Fraction: Both drugs are approved for heart failure patients regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction.

  • Personalized Treatment: The choice between Inpefa and Jardiance depends on a patient's individual health conditions and needs and should be made with a healthcare provider.

In This Article

Understanding the SGLT Inhibitors

Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) inhibitors are a class of medications that work by affecting how the body handles glucose and sodium. The main targets for this class of drugs are the SGLT1 and SGLT2 proteins. SGLT2 proteins are primarily located in the kidneys and are responsible for reabsorbing most of the glucose from filtered urine back into the bloodstream. SGLT1 proteins are found in both the kidneys and the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, where they play a role in absorbing glucose from food. By blocking these proteins, SGLT inhibitors cause the body to excrete more glucose in the urine, which helps lower blood sugar levels. The specific targets of Inpefa and Jardiance are the fundamental difference between the two drugs, which impacts their overall effect on the body.

Inpefa: A Dual SGLT1 and SGLT2 Inhibitor

Inpefa, with the active ingredient sotagliflozin, is a newer medication that acts as a dual inhibitor, blocking both SGLT1 and SGLT2. This dual action means it influences glucose and sodium transport in two key areas: the kidneys (via SGLT2) and the intestines (via SGLT1). By inhibiting SGLT1 in the gut, sotagliflozin can help delay intestinal glucose absorption after meals, potentially providing a more balanced glycemic control.

Inpefa was specifically studied in patients with worsening heart failure and is approved to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, and urgent heart failure visits in adults with or without type 2 diabetes. Its approval extends to all heart failure patients, irrespective of their left ventricular ejection fraction.

Jardiance: A Selective SGLT2 Inhibitor

Jardiance, containing the active ingredient empagliflozin, is a selective SGLT2 inhibitor. Its action is focused solely on the kidneys, blocking the reabsorption of glucose from the urine. This mechanism results in increased glucose excretion and helps reduce blood sugar levels.

Jardiance has broader approved indications than Inpefa. It is approved for use in adults and children (10 years and older) with type 2 diabetes to improve blood sugar control. Additionally, it is used to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization in adults with heart failure across all ejection fractions and to reduce the risk of kidney function decline in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Comparative studies have also suggested strong evidence for its cardiovascular mortality reduction in patients with established cardiovascular disease.

Inpefa vs. Jardiance: A Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature Inpefa (Sotagliflozin) Jardiance (Empagliflozin)
Drug Class Dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitor Selective SGLT2 inhibitor
Mechanism Inhibits glucose reabsorption in kidneys and intestinal glucose absorption Inhibits glucose reabsorption exclusively in the kidneys
Primary Targets SGLT1 (gut & kidneys), SGLT2 (kidneys) SGLT2 (kidneys)
FDA Indications Heart failure (all ejection fractions), with or without type 2 diabetes Type 2 diabetes, heart failure (all ejection fractions), and chronic kidney disease
Noteworthy Study Studied in patients with worsening heart failure Strong cardiovascular outcomes evidence, including for mortality
Common Side Effects Urinary tract infections (UTIs), genital yeast infections, volume depletion, diarrhea UTIs, genital yeast infections, volume depletion, but not typically diarrhea
Formulation Oral tablet, once daily Oral tablet, once daily

Key Differences in Action and Effects

1. Dual vs. Selective Mechanism The most significant difference is the mechanism of action. Inpefa's dual action on SGLT1 and SGLT2 gives it an effect on both kidney and intestinal glucose management, whereas Jardiance's effect is confined to the kidneys. This difference can impact post-meal glucose handling and may be a factor in treatment choice, especially for patients who have specific glycemic needs.

2. Primary and Approved Indications While both medications are used for heart failure and offer benefits for patients with type 2 diabetes, their official approvals differ. Inpefa is marketed specifically for heart failure and is not an FDA-approved treatment solely for diabetes, though it does lower blood sugar. Jardiance, conversely, has explicit and long-standing approval for managing type 2 diabetes in addition to its heart failure and CKD indications.

3. Side Effect Profile The dual action of Inpefa, specifically its SGLT1 inhibition in the gut, introduces a side effect profile that includes diarrhea, a symptom not commonly associated with selective SGLT2 inhibitors like Jardiance. Both medications can increase the risk of urinary tract and genital yeast infections due to increased glucose in the urine.

4. Clinical Evidence and Patient Population Inpefa's trials, such as SOLOIST-WHF, focused on patients with worsening heart failure, a population that may be distinct from some of the long-term, stable cardiovascular disease patients studied in Jardiance trials. The nuanced differences in their clinical trial populations and data can influence a clinician's choice depending on the patient's specific cardiovascular history and disease state.

Important Considerations for Patients

Choosing between Inpefa and Jardiance is not a simple matter of selecting one over the other. The decision must be made in consultation with a healthcare provider, who will consider the patient's complete medical history, including their specific type of heart failure, diabetes status, and any pre-existing gastrointestinal issues.

Here are some final points to consider:

  • Individualized Treatment: The optimal treatment for heart failure and related conditions is highly individual. What works best for one patient might not be suitable for another.
  • Comprehensive Assessment: Doctors will evaluate a patient's entire health profile to determine which medication offers the most benefits and the least risk of side effects.
  • Monitoring: Regular monitoring for side effects, such as urinary infections, and reporting any new symptoms, like diarrhea with Inpefa, is crucial.

Conclusion

To definitively answer the question, "Is Inpefa the same as Jardiance?", the answer is no. While they belong to the same class of drugs and share some therapeutic benefits, they are fundamentally different due to their unique mechanisms of action. Inpefa (sotagliflozin) is a dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitor that affects both the kidneys and the gut, while Jardiance (empagliflozin) is a selective SGLT2 inhibitor acting only on the kidneys. These differences influence their specific indications, side effect profiles, and which patient populations they may be best suited for. For any patient considering these medications, a thorough discussion with a healthcare provider is essential to determine the most appropriate course of treatment for their specific health needs.

For more in-depth information on SGLT inhibitors in heart failure, see articles published by the American College of Cardiology.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main difference is their mechanism. Inpefa (sotagliflozin) is a dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitor, affecting both the kidneys and the gut. Jardiance (empagliflozin) is a selective SGLT2 inhibitor, affecting only the kidneys.

Inpefa is not specifically approved to treat diabetes itself, but it can lower blood sugar in people with Type 2 diabetes due to its mechanism of action. Jardiance, on the other hand, is explicitly approved for the management of Type 2 diabetes.

They share some common side effects like urinary tract infections and genital yeast infections. However, Inpefa's dual action can cause diarrhea, a side effect less common with Jardiance.

Both Inpefa and Jardiance are effective for heart failure. Inpefa has specific evidence for patients with worsening heart failure, while Jardiance has robust cardiovascular mortality data. The 'better' option depends on the individual patient's medical history and needs.

No, neither Inpefa (sotagliflozin) nor Jardiance (empagliflozin) currently has a generic version available.

Dosages for both medications are determined by a healthcare provider based on the patient's individual needs, medical history, and specific condition being treated.

No, these medications target the same SGLT pathway and should not be used together. A healthcare provider will determine which medication is most appropriate for a patient.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.