Skip to content

Is Stavudine still available? An overview of its discontinuation

3 min read

First approved by the FDA in 1994, the antiretroviral medication Stavudine (also known as d4T) was once a key treatment for HIV. In response to the question, 'Is Stavudine still available?', the answer is no, particularly in the US and most resource-rich settings, due to severe and irreversible side effects.

Quick Summary

Stavudine, an HIV antiretroviral formerly known as Zerit, is no longer available in the U.S. and has been largely phased out globally. Its discontinuation resulted from severe side effects and the development of modern, safer HIV treatments with greater efficacy.

Key Points

  • Not Available in the U.S.: The antiretroviral drug Stavudine (d4T) and its brand name, Zerit, are no longer commercially available in the United States.

  • Reasons for Discontinuation: Stavudine was phased out due to its severe, irreversible side effects, which included lipoatrophy (fat wasting), peripheral neuropathy, and lactic acidosis.

  • WHO Recommendation: The World Health Organization officially recommended phasing out Stavudine in 2009 due to its long-term toxicity.

  • Replaced by Safer Drugs: Modern HIV treatments, such as Tenofovir and Emtricitabine, are significantly safer and more effective, replacing Stavudine in standard care.

  • Historical Context: Despite its high toxicity, Stavudine was historically important as an early, affordable HIV drug, especially in resource-limited settings before safer alternatives were widely accessible.

  • Global Status: While its use has been actively discouraged and phased out globally, some resource-limited regions may have historically used it due to cost; however, its availability and use have dramatically decreased.

  • Irreversible Side Effects: Some of Stavudine's side effects, like lipoatrophy, were often not reversible even after discontinuing the medication.

In This Article

The Rise and Fall of Stavudine

Stavudine, or d4T, a nucleoside analog reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), was a significant development in the fight against HIV/AIDS. It was the fourth drug approved for treating HIV infection by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1994, marketed under the brand name Zerit by Bristol-Myers Squibb. The drug provided an essential treatment option for many patients in the early days of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART).

However, its widespread use revealed a serious and long-term pattern of toxic side effects, which would ultimately lead to its global discontinuation. The drug’s main drawbacks were linked to its high potential for mitochondrial toxicity, especially with long-term use. This led to a consensus among global health authorities that the risks associated with Stavudine outweighed its benefits when safer and more effective alternatives became available.

Why Stavudine Was Discontinued

By the late 2000s, newer and better-tolerated antiretroviral medications had entered the market, and the significant toxicities of Stavudine became impossible to ignore. In November 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) took a major step by recommending that countries phase out the use of Stavudine because of its “long-term, irreversible side-effects”. This recommendation was a pivotal moment, shifting global public health policy away from the older, more toxic drug towards safer options like Zidovudine (AZT) or Tenofovir (TDF).

Several factors contributed to the decision to remove Stavudine from standard treatment regimens:

  • Severe Side Effects: A number of serious and debilitating side effects were strongly associated with Stavudine use. These included the irreversible loss of body fat (lipodystrophy), painful nerve damage (peripheral neuropathy), and a potentially fatal condition called lactic acidosis.
  • Development of Safer Alternatives: As the pipeline for HIV medications advanced, less toxic NRTIs became available. These newer drugs offered comparable or better viral suppression with a much-improved safety profile, making continued use of Stavudine medically unjustifiable.
  • Decreased Demand: With better options available, both demand for Stavudine and the rationale for its continued production declined significantly. This lack of market demand ultimately led manufacturers to cease production.

Notable Stavudine Side Effects

  • Lipoatrophy: Stavudine is notorious for causing lipoatrophy, or the progressive wasting of subcutaneous fat, especially in the face, limbs, and buttocks. This was not only a cosmetic issue but also a significant marker of toxicity.
  • Peripheral Neuropathy: A dose-related side effect involving nerve damage that causes pain, burning, tingling, or numbness in the hands and feet. This condition could sometimes worsen temporarily even after stopping the drug.
  • Lactic Acidosis: A rare but life-threatening complication characterized by a buildup of lactic acid in the blood. This risk was notably higher when Stavudine was combined with another older NRTI, Didanosine.

The Shift to Modern Antiretroviral Regimens

Today, HIV treatment involves highly effective and well-tolerated combination therapies that have revolutionized care for people with HIV. The current first-line regimens recommended by organizations like the NIH and WHO almost universally exclude Stavudine. Instead, they rely on newer NRTIs, integrase inhibitors, and other drug classes that provide potent viral control with minimal long-term toxicity.

Comparison: Stavudine vs. Modern NRTIs

Feature Stavudine (d4T) Modern NRTIs (e.g., Tenofovir/Emtricitabine)
Effectiveness Historically effective, but superseded by newer drugs Highly effective in combination therapy
Toxicity Profile High risk of severe, irreversible side effects, particularly lipoatrophy and peripheral neuropathy Significantly lower risk of severe long-term toxicities
Long-Term Use Not recommended due to cumulative toxicity Designed for long-term use and often included in once-daily regimens
Current Availability Discontinued in the US; phased out globally, though historically used in resource-limited settings Widely available and recommended as standard of care

Conclusion: Looking Beyond Stavudine

As of 2025, Stavudine is no longer available in the United States and has been globally phased out from standard treatment guidelines. While it played a critical role in the history of HIV treatment as an early and affordable option, its high toxicity profile rendered it obsolete in the face of superior alternatives. The evolution of antiretroviral medications has led to dramatically safer and more effective therapies, allowing people with HIV to live longer, healthier lives with fewer long-term complications. The story of Stavudine is a testament to the continuous progress and improvement in medical science, where yesterday's groundbreaking treatment can be replaced by tomorrow's safer innovation.

For more detailed, up-to-date information on HIV treatment guidelines, consult the official resources from the National Institutes of Health. https://hivinfo.nih.gov/understanding-hiv/fact-sheets/hiv-treatment-basics.

Frequently Asked Questions

Stavudine was discontinued primarily because of its high potential for severe, long-term, and irreversible side effects, such as lipodystrophy (body fat wasting), peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage), and lactic acidosis. The development of safer, more effective antiretroviral alternatives also contributed to its obsolescence.

Stavudine was sold under the brand name Zerit. Both the brand-name and generic versions have been discontinued in most parts of the world.

While Stavudine was historically used in resource-limited settings due to its low cost, its use has been actively phased out following the 2009 recommendation by the World Health Organization (WHO). Safer and more affordable alternatives are now prioritized.

The most concerning side effects of Stavudine included lipodystrophy (especially fat loss in the face and limbs), peripheral neuropathy (numbness, tingling, or pain in the hands and feet), and potentially fatal lactic acidosis.

Safer and more effective nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) like Tenofovir and Emtricitabine have replaced Stavudine in modern HIV treatment regimens. These are typically used in combination with other classes of drugs.

No, Stavudine (d4T) and AZT (Zidovudine) are different drugs, although they both belong to the NRTI class of antiretrovirals. Both are older drugs with notable side effects, but AZT has a more favorable toxicity profile than Stavudine and was often used as an alternative.

For up-to-date and reliable information on current HIV treatment regimens, it is best to consult official resources from health organizations such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the World Health Organization (WHO).

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.