Skip to content

Market Dynamics and Generic Entry: Why is Suboxone Being Discontinued in Certain Forms?

4 min read

In 2012, the manufacturer of Suboxone announced the voluntary discontinuation of its tablet form, citing concerns over pediatric exposure which were 7.8 to 8.5 times higher than with the film version [1.2.5, 1.2.7]. This move answers the question 'Why is Suboxone being discontinued?' by revealing a pivotal market shift toward newer, patent-protected formulations and, eventually, widespread generic alternatives.

Quick Summary

The narrative of Suboxone's discontinuation is not about the medication vanishing, but a strategic market shift. Brand-name tablets were phased out in favor of the sublingual film, followed by the rise of cost-effective generic versions of both.

Key Points

  • Tablet Discontinuation: The brand-name Suboxone tablet was discontinued in 2012 by its manufacturer, who cited safety concerns but also faced the expiration of the tablet's patent [1.2.4, 1.2.3].

  • Film Remains Available: The brand-name Suboxone film has not been discontinued and is still approved by the FDA, though it is less commonly used than its generic counterparts [1.2.1, 1.3.7].

  • Rise of Generics: The primary reason brand-name Suboxone is less prescribed is the widespread availability of lower-cost, FDA-approved generic buprenorphine/naloxone films and tablets since 2018 and 2013, respectively [1.3.6].

  • Cost is Key: Generics contain the same active ingredients but are significantly cheaper, making them the preferred choice for most insurance plans and patients paying out-of-pocket [1.5.1, 1.7.2].

  • Treatment is Not Gone: The core medication, buprenorphine/naloxone, is more accessible than ever due to generics and is still a gold standard for treating opioid use disorder [1.8.2].

  • New Alternatives Exist: The treatment landscape has expanded to include other options like long-acting injectables (Sublocade®, Brixadi®) that offer monthly or weekly dosing [1.8.5, 1.8.6].

In This Article

The Misconception of Discontinuation

When patients and providers ask, "Why is Suboxone being discontinued?", the question often stems from a misunderstanding of market dynamics rather than a complete withdrawal of the medication. Buprenorphine/naloxone, the active combination in Suboxone, remains a cornerstone of Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) for Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) [1.8.2]. The story of its "discontinuation" is primarily about the brand-name tablet form being phased out and the subsequent rise of generic alternatives for the sublingual film [1.3.1, 1.3.3]. The brand-name Suboxone film itself is still FDA-approved and available, though less commonly used due to the cost-effectiveness of generics [1.2.1, 1.5.1].

A Strategic Pivot: From Tablets to Films

In September 2012, the original manufacturer, Reckitt Benckiser (now Indivior), announced it would voluntarily discontinue the supply of Suboxone sublingual tablets in the United States [1.2.4, 1.2.5]. The publicly stated reason was safety, specifically data from U.S. Poison Control Centers indicating that accidental pediatric exposure rates were significantly higher for tablets sold in multi-dose bottles compared to individually packaged sublingual films [1.2.7].

However, this move coincided with the impending patent expiration for the tablet formulation. Critics and government bodies suggested the safety concern was a pretext to shift the market to the newer, patent-protected Suboxone Film before generic tablets could enter and erode profits [1.2.3, 1.4.2]. The goal was to convert as many patients as possible to the film version, for which patents extended much further [1.2.3, 1.6.2]. This practice, sometimes called "product hopping," ultimately led to legal challenges and a $1.4 billion settlement with the Department of Justice in 2019 [1.2.6, 1.4.2]. While the FDA determined the tablets were not withdrawn for reasons of safety or effectiveness, the manufacturer had already ceased their production [1.2.2, 1.4.1].

The Era of Generics and Market Impact

Following the discontinuation of brand-name tablets, the first generic buprenorphine/naloxone tablets were approved by the FDA in 2013 [1.3.6]. Later, in 2018, the FDA approved the first generic versions of the Suboxone sublingual film [1.3.6, 1.3.7]. This was a watershed moment for OUD treatment.

The availability of generics dramatically increased access and reduced costs. The main difference between the brand-name Suboxone film and its generic counterparts is not the active ingredients, dosage, or effectiveness, but rather the price and inactive ingredients like flavorings [1.5.1, 1.7.2]. A 30-day supply of a generic version can be significantly cheaper than the brand-name product, with retail prices for generics sometimes being less than a third of the brand-name cost [1.7.2, 1.7.3]. Consequently, most insurance plans now prefer or require the use of generic buprenorphine/naloxone, making it the standard for most patients [1.5.1, 1.3.7].

Comparison of Buprenorphine/Naloxone Formulations

Feature Brand-Name Suboxone Film Generic Buprenorphine/Naloxone Film Generic Buprenorphine/Naloxone Tablet
Manufacturer Indivior (formerly Reckitt Benckiser) [1.3.7] Various (e.g., Dr. Reddy's, Mylan) [1.3.7] Various [1.3.6]
Availability Available but less common due to cost [1.3.7] Widely available and preferred by insurance [1.5.1] Widely available [1.3.1, 1.3.6]
Form Sublingual Film [1.3.4] Sublingual Film [1.3.4] Sublingual Tablet [1.3.1]
Active Ingredients Buprenorphine & Naloxone [1.3.3] Buprenorphine & Naloxone [1.5.1] Buprenorphine & Naloxone [1.3.1]
Cost Highest cost, ~$150-$585 for a 30-day supply without insurance [1.7.1, 1.7.2] Lower cost, ~$40-$160 for a 30-day supply without insurance [1.7.1, 1.7.2] Generally the most cost-effective option [1.5.2]
FDA Approval Approved [1.2.1] Approved and bioequivalent to brand [1.3.6] Approved and bioequivalent to original tablet [1.3.6]

The Evolving Landscape: Beyond the Film

The evolution of buprenorphine treatment did not stop with generics. The pharmaceutical market has continued to innovate, introducing alternative delivery systems and formulations to improve patient adherence and outcomes.

  • Zubsolv®: A sublingual tablet that also contains buprenorphine and naloxone, but has a different bioavailability, meaning a lower dose can achieve the same effect as a higher dose of Suboxone [1.5.5].
  • Long-Acting Injectables: Medications like Sublocade® and Brixadi® are administered by a healthcare professional on a monthly or weekly basis [1.8.5, 1.8.6]. These injections provide a steady level of buprenorphine, eliminating the need for daily dosing. This improves adherence, reduces the risk of diversion or misuse, and removes a daily reminder of the medication [1.8.2, 1.8.5].

These alternatives provide more options for clinicians and patients, allowing for treatment plans that are more tailored to an individual's lifestyle, needs, and recovery stage [1.8.1]. For example, a patient who struggles with daily dosing may be a great candidate for a long-acting injectable [1.8.2].

Conclusion: A Story of Access and Affordability

The question 'Why is Suboxone being discontinued?' reveals a complex history of pharmaceutical strategy, patent protection, and market evolution. The brand-name Suboxone tablet was indeed discontinued, but this was a strategic move to promote the patent-protected film version. The subsequent entry of generic films and tablets has fundamentally reshaped the treatment landscape, making the life-saving medication buprenorphine/naloxone more affordable and accessible than ever before. For patients today, the core medication is readily available, primarily in its cost-effective generic forms, alongside newer innovative alternatives like long-acting injectables. The discontinuation was not an end, but a transition to a more diverse and accessible market for OUD treatment.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult with a qualified healthcare provider for any health concerns or before making any decisions related to your medical treatment. An authoritative source for information on opioid use disorder treatment is the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

Frequently Asked Questions

The brand-name Suboxone tablets were discontinued by the manufacturer in 2012 [1.3.1]. However, the brand-name Suboxone film is still produced and FDA-approved, but widely replaced by more affordable generic versions [1.2.1, 1.3.3].

Yes, generic buprenorphine/naloxone contains the same active ingredients in the same dosages and is proven to be just as safe and effective as brand-name Suboxone [1.5.1]. The main differences are in price, appearance, and inactive ingredients like flavorings [1.5.1, 1.7.2].

The manufacturer officially cited higher rates of accidental pediatric exposure with the tablets compared to the individually wrapped films [1.2.5]. However, this decision also coincided with the tablet's patent expiration, leading to accusations that the move was intended to switch patients to the newer, patent-protected film before generics could compete [1.2.3, 1.4.2].

Generic Suboxone is significantly cheaper. For a 30-day supply, a brand-name version might cost $150-$170 or more, while a generic version could be around $40-$57, depending on the pharmacy and location [1.7.2, 1.7.5].

Yes, switching is common and generally seamless as the active medication is identical. Most insurance plans encourage or require using generics due to the cost savings [1.5.1]. You should always discuss any medication changes with your doctor.

The leading alternatives are long-acting injectables like Sublocade® and Brixadi®. These are administered by a healthcare provider monthly or weekly, providing a consistent dose of buprenorphine without the need for daily medication [1.8.2, 1.8.5].

Neither is universally 'better'; they serve different needs. Sublocade is a once-monthly injection that can improve treatment adherence and reduce the risk of misuse [1.8.2]. Suboxone is a daily dose that offers more flexibility. The best choice depends on a patient's individual circumstances and should be decided with a doctor [1.8.1].

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.