Skip to content

The Race Against Resistance: Are New Antibiotics Being Discovered?

4 min read

Forecasts predict that between 2025 and 2050, bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR) will be directly responsible for 39 million deaths globally [1.6.3]. Amid this crisis, the critical question remains: are new antibiotics being discovered quickly enough to counter this threat?

Quick Summary

Yes, new antibiotics are being discovered, aided by AI and novel screening methods. However, the development pipeline is insufficient to meet the growing challenge of antimicrobial resistance due to significant scientific and economic hurdles.

Key Points

  • AMR is a Crisis: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat, projected to cause millions of deaths in the coming decades [1.6.3].

  • Discovery is Happening: Yes, new antibiotics are being discovered, but the overall development pipeline is currently insufficient to meet the global need [1.3.3].

  • AI is a Game-Changer: Artificial intelligence is dramatically accelerating the search for new antibiotics by rapidly screening vast chemical libraries and even designing new molecules [1.4.1].

  • Economic Hurdles are Significant: A broken economic model, where the high cost of development is not met by potential profits, is a major barrier to new antibiotic R&D [1.3.2].

  • Policy Solutions are Needed: Legislation like the PASTEUR Act aims to fix the market by creating subscription models that delink profit from sales volume [1.8.1].

  • Novel Methods Show Promise: Scientists are using new techniques to explore previously unculturable microbes from sources like soil and oceans to find new compounds [1.3.2].

  • Non-Traditional Therapies: Alternatives like phage therapy, antimicrobial peptides, and antibodies are being developed as new ways to combat resistant bacteria [1.7.2, 1.7.4].

In This Article

The Growing Shadow of Antimicrobial Resistance

The golden age of antibiotics, which began with the discovery of penicillin, has waned. For decades, the rediscovery of known compounds and incremental modifications to existing drug classes were the norm [1.3.1, 1.3.2]. This innovation gap has occurred alongside the rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), where bacteria evolve to render treatments ineffective. Forecasts from the Global Research on Antimicrobial Resistance (GRAM) Project suggest AMR will cause 39 million deaths between 2025 and 2050 [1.6.3]. The World Health Organization (WHO) describes the current pipeline of new antibiotics as "insufficient" to address this escalating threat, with very few candidates possessing innovative characteristics that could overcome existing cross-resistance [1.3.3].

Scientific and Economic Hurdles in Development

Discovering and developing new antibiotics is a complex, expensive, and high-risk endeavor. The journey from initial discovery to an FDA-approved drug can take over a decade and cost more than $2 billion, with a low probability of success [1.3.2].

Key Challenges:

  • Scientific Complexity: A primary scientific challenge is getting molecules to penetrate the complex and resilient cell walls of bacteria, particularly Gram-negative pathogens [1.3.1, 1.4.5]. For years, drug discovery was also hampered by an adherence to principles like Lipinski's 'rule of five,' which inadvertently filtered out promising antibiotic candidates that don't fit the typical drug profile [1.3.2].
  • Broken Economic Model: Antibiotics present an unattractive investment for pharmaceutical companies. They are used for short durations, and to preserve their effectiveness, new, potent antibiotics are held in reserve, limiting sales volume. The predicted net present value (NPV) of a new antibiotic is estimated at negative $50 million, meaning development costs are expected to exceed future revenue [1.3.2]. This market failure has led many large pharmaceutical companies to exit the field, leaving research largely to smaller biotech companies and academic institutions [1.3.5].
  • Discovery Void: The traditional method of screening soil microbes, known as the Waksman Platform, led to frequent rediscovery of known compounds and was largely abandoned. The subsequent shift to target-based screening also failed to produce new classes of antibiotics, as hits in a cell-free system often failed to work in live bacterial cells [1.3.2].

A New Era of Discovery: AI and Novel Approaches

Despite the challenges, new antibiotics are being discovered, thanks to innovative technologies and a return to older methods with a modern twist.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

AI, and specifically machine learning (ML), is revolutionizing the discovery process. Scientists can train AI models on vast datasets of chemical structures to predict which molecules might have antibacterial properties [1.4.1]. These models can screen billions of compounds in a fraction of the time it would take in a lab [1.4.3]. Generative AI can even design entirely new molecules from scratch that have the desired characteristics to be effective antibiotics [1.4.2]. This approach has already led to the identification of novel antibiotic candidates, including compounds that work through new mechanisms of action [1.4.1, 1.4.3].

Modernized Natural Product Screening

There is a renewed interest in screening natural sources, but with advanced techniques. This includes exploring untapped environments like marine ecosystems and using new methods to grow previously "unculturable" bacteria, which make up an estimated 99% of bacteria in soil and marine samples [1.3.2]. The discovery of Lariocidin, a lasso-shaped peptide from a soil bacterium, is a recent example of this renewed approach. Lariocidin has a unique mechanism and shows activity against a wide spectrum of bacteria [1.5.3, 1.5.6].

Feature Traditional Screening (Waksman Era) Modern AI-Powered Screening
Method Phenotypic screening of soil microbes in culture [1.3.2] In-silico screening of massive digital libraries, generative design [1.4.1, 1.4.2]
Speed Slow, laborious, manual process [1.3.2] Extremely fast, capable of analyzing billions of compounds quickly [1.4.3]
Novelty High rate of rediscovering known compounds [1.3.2] High potential for identifying novel chemical structures and mechanisms [1.4.1]
Cost High cost in terms of time and lab resources Reduces initial screening costs, but lab validation is still required [1.4.5]
Example Find Penicillin, Streptomycin [1.3.2] Halicin, Zosurabalpin (AI-assisted) [1.4.3, 1.5.1]

Non-Traditional Therapies on the Horizon

Beyond conventional antibiotics, researchers are exploring a range of non-traditional antibacterial therapies to fight resistant infections [1.7.3]. These include:

  • Phage Therapy: Using viruses that specifically infect and kill bacteria [1.7.2].
  • Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs): Naturally occurring molecules that are part of the innate immune system and can disrupt bacterial membranes [1.7.2].
  • Antibodies: Monoclonal antibodies can be designed to target specific bacteria or neutralize their toxins [1.7.4].
  • CRISPR-Cas Systems: Gene-editing technology can be used to specifically target and destroy antibiotic resistance genes within bacteria [1.7.4].

Policy and Economic Solutions

To fix the broken economic model, new incentives are being developed. Push incentives, like grants from CARB-X, help subsidize the cost of early-stage research [1.9.5]. Pull incentives aim to reward successful development. A key proposal in the United States is the PASTEUR Act, which would create a subscription model. Under this model, the government would pay developers a contract fee for access to a new, critical-need antibiotic, delinking the company's revenue from the volume of sales [1.8.1, 1.8.4]. This approach encourages the development of urgently needed drugs while also promoting stewardship by removing the incentive to oversell.

Conclusion: A Cautiously Optimistic Future

The threat of antimicrobial resistance is one of the most significant public health challenges of our time. While the antibiotic pipeline is not as robust as it needs to be, the answer to 'Are new antibiotics being discovered?' is a hopeful yes. Breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, a resurgence in natural product discovery, and the development of non-traditional therapies are providing new candidates. However, scientific and technological innovation alone is not enough. Sustained investment, innovative economic models like the one proposed in the PASTEUR Act, and global cooperation are essential to translate these discoveries into the life-saving medicines needed to stay ahead in the race against resistance [1.3.5, 1.9.5].

For more information on the global effort against antimicrobial resistance, you can visit the World Health Organization (WHO).

Frequently Asked Questions

There are two primary challenges: the scientific difficulty of finding compounds that can penetrate bacterial cells and overcome their defense mechanisms, and a broken economic model where the high cost and low return on investment deter pharmaceutical companies from R&D [1.3.1, 1.3.2].

AI models are trained to recognize the structural features of molecules that are effective against bacteria. They can then screen billions of potential compounds in a short time to identify promising candidates for lab testing, a process that is much faster than traditional methods [1.4.1, 1.4.3].

Yes, though rarely. Recent discoveries include compounds like zosurabalpin and lariocidin, which represent new classes of antibiotics that work via novel mechanisms, offering hope against bacteria resistant to older drugs [1.5.1, 1.5.2].

Antimicrobial resistance occurs when germs like bacteria and fungi develop the ability to defeat the drugs designed to kill them. This means the germs are not killed and continue to grow, making common infections difficult or impossible to treat [1.3.2].

The return on investment for antibiotics is very low compared to drugs for chronic conditions. Antibiotics are used for short periods, and new ones are often kept in reserve to prevent resistance, leading to low sales volumes that don't cover the multi-billion dollar development costs [1.3.2, 1.8.4].

The PASTEUR Act is proposed U.S. legislation that would create a 'subscription model' for new, critical antibiotics. The government would pay a fixed fee for access to the drug, regardless of how much is used. This guarantees a return for the developer and encourages innovation [1.8.1, 1.8.4].

They are alternatives to traditional antibiotic drugs. Examples include phage therapy (using viruses to kill bacteria), antimicrobial peptides, and monoclonal antibodies that specifically target pathogens or their toxins [1.7.2, 1.7.4].

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.