Skip to content

Understanding the Gaps: What Bacteria Does Ciprofloxacin Not Treat?

4 min read

Increasing ciprofloxacin resistance has been reported in a wide range of bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Enterococci [1.3.6]. This article answers the question: what bacteria does ciprofloxacin not treat, covering both intrinsic and acquired resistance.

Quick Summary

Ciprofloxacin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic, but many bacteria are not susceptible. It has poor activity against most anaerobic bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis, and shows high acquired resistance in MRSA and Pseudomonas.

Key Points

  • Intrinsic Resistance: Ciprofloxacin has poor activity against most anaerobic bacteria and Enterococcus faecalis [1.7.4, 1.3.1].

  • Limited Gram-Positive Coverage: The drug shows limited activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae and is not considered a "respiratory fluoroquinolone" [1.3.5].

  • High Acquired Resistance: Bacteria like Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa frequently develop high levels of resistance [1.9.1, 1.6.5].

  • No Longer for Gonorrhea: Due to widespread resistance, ciprofloxacin is no longer a recommended treatment for Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections [1.2.1].

  • Growing E. coli Resistance: Resistance in Escherichia coli, a common cause of UTIs, is increasing globally, complicating treatment choices [1.2.2].

  • Mechanisms of Resistance: Resistance occurs mainly through mutations in the target enzymes (DNA gyrase) or by actively pumping the drug out of the bacterial cell [1.2.1].

  • Combination Therapy Often Needed: For mixed infections involving anaerobes, ciprofloxacin must be combined with another agent like metronidazole [1.7.1].

In This Article

Ciprofloxacin is a powerful, broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone antibiotic used to treat a wide variety of bacterial infections, from urinary tract infections (UTIs) to typhoid fever [1.4.1]. It works by inhibiting bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, enzymes essential for DNA replication and cell division [1.4.2]. However, despite its wide range of activity, there are significant gaps in its coverage. Some bacteria are naturally (intrinsically) resistant, while others have developed (acquired) resistance over time, posing a major public health challenge [1.3.1].

Understanding Ciprofloxacin's Mechanism and Resistance

Ciprofloxacin's effectiveness relies on its ability to bind to and inhibit DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV [1.5.1]. Resistance primarily emerges through two main pathways:

  1. Alterations in Target Enzymes: Mutations in the genes that code for these enzymes (specifically the gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes) can prevent ciprofloxacin from binding effectively. This is a common mechanism in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [1.2.1].
  2. Altered Drug Permeation: Bacteria can reduce the intracellular concentration of ciprofloxacin through two methods. They can decrease the drug's entry by altering porin channels in the outer membrane (in Gram-negative bacteria) or actively pump the drug out using efflux pumps [1.2.1, 1.9.4].

Bacteria with Intrinsic Resistance

Some bacteria are naturally not susceptible to ciprofloxacin due to their inherent biological structure or function.

Anaerobic Bacteria

Ciprofloxacin generally has poor activity against most obligate anaerobic bacteria, such as those in the Bacteroides fragilis group [1.7.2, 1.7.4]. Studies have shown that a low percentage of anaerobic strains are susceptible to ciprofloxacin [1.7.2]. For infections where anaerobes are suspected, such as intra-abdominal infections, ciprofloxacin is typically combined with a drug that specifically covers anaerobes, like metronidazole [1.7.1].

Enterococcus Species

Enterococci, particularly Enterococcus faecalis, often exhibit poor susceptibility to ciprofloxacin [1.3.1]. While it is sometimes indicated for UTIs caused by E. faecalis, resistance rates are high and its effectiveness is often uncertain [1.8.3, 1.8.4]. One study on complicated UTIs in men found a ciprofloxacin resistance rate of 47% in E. faecalis isolates, leading to the conclusion that it is no longer a recommended therapy for these patients if they have certain risk factors [1.8.5].

Many Streptococci

While some fluoroquinolones are known as "respiratory quinolones" for their enhanced activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, ciprofloxacin is not considered one of them due to its limited activity [1.3.5]. Streptococci are generally not highly susceptible to ciprofloxacin [1.4.5].

The Growing Challenge of Acquired Resistance

Perhaps more concerning than intrinsic resistance is the increasing number of bacteria that were once treatable with ciprofloxacin but are now frequently resistant.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

While methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is often susceptible, MRSA shows alarmingly high rates of resistance to ciprofloxacin. In one study, 92.5% of MRSA isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, compared to a much lower rate in MSSA [1.9.1]. This cross-resistance means ciprofloxacin can no longer be relied upon for empirical treatment of suspected MRSA infections [1.9.1].

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Ciprofloxacin has long been a key oral antibiotic for treating P. aeruginosa infections, especially in patients with cystic fibrosis [1.3.2]. However, resistance can be rapidly acquired [1.6.6]. This bacterium readily develops resistance through mutations in its DNA gyrase and through the overexpression of efflux pumps [1.6.5]. Resistance rates are variable but significant, often exceeding 40% in some studies [1.3.1].

Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Ciprofloxacin was once a primary treatment for gonorrhea, but widespread resistance has rendered it ineffective. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) no longer recommends fluoroquinolones for treating gonorrhea in the United States due to high resistance rates stemming from mutations in the gyrA gene [1.2.1].

Enterobacteriaceae (E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae)

Though ciprofloxacin is still used for infections caused by E. coli and K. pneumoniae, resistance is a major and growing problem [1.3.1]. High rates of resistance in E. coli causing UTIs are frequently reported, with some studies showing resistance in over 70% of isolates [1.2.2]. Similarly, K. pneumoniae has shown some of the highest resistance levels to ciprofloxacin among common pathogens [1.3.1].

Comparison Table: Ciprofloxacin's Spectrum of Activity

Bacterium Group/Species General Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin
Most Enterobacteriaceae (e.g., E. coli) Susceptible, but resistance is widespread and increasing [1.3.1, 1.2.2]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Variable; high rates of acquired resistance are common [1.6.5, 1.6.6]
Neisseria gonorrhoeae Generally Resistant; no longer recommended for treatment [1.2.1]
Enterococcus faecalis Generally Resistant or has poor susceptibility [1.3.1, 1.8.5]
Most Anaerobic Bacteria (Bacteroides spp.) Generally Resistant [1.7.3, 1.7.4]
Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus (MRSA) Generally Resistant (over 90% in some studies) [1.9.1]
Streptococcus pneumoniae Poor or limited activity; not a "respiratory fluoroquinolone" [1.3.5]
Atypical Pathogens (Chlamydia, Mycoplasma) Susceptible [1.3.2]

Conclusion

While ciprofloxacin remains an important antibiotic, its utility is significantly limited by both intrinsic and acquired resistance. It is largely ineffective against anaerobic bacteria and many enterococcal and streptococcal species [1.7.4, 1.3.1, 1.3.5]. Furthermore, acquired resistance has become so prevalent in organisms like MRSA, P. aeruginosa, and N. gonorrhoeae that ciprofloxacin is often no longer a reliable empirical choice for infections caused by these pathogens [1.9.1, 1.6.6, 1.2.1]. This underscores the critical importance of antimicrobial stewardship, susceptibility testing to guide treatment, and the development of new therapeutic agents to combat the ever-growing threat of antibiotic resistance.


For more information on the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, you can visit the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Frequently Asked Questions

No, ciprofloxacin is generally not effective against MRSA. Studies show very high resistance rates, with one report indicating over 92% of MRSA isolates were resistant [1.9.1].

Ciprofloxacin has poor activity against most anaerobic bacteria, such as Bacteroides fragilis. It is generally not recommended for treating anaerobic infections [1.7.3, 1.7.4].

Ciprofloxacin is generally not used for strep throat, which is caused by Streptococcus species. It has limited activity against most streptococci [1.4.5].

Due to widespread resistance, ciprofloxacin is no longer recommended by health organizations like the CDC for treating Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The resistance is primarily due to mutations in the bacterial gyrA gene [1.2.1].

Ciprofloxacin's activity against Enterococcus, particularly E. faecalis, is unreliable due to high rates of intrinsic and acquired resistance. It is often not a recommended treatment, especially for complicated infections [1.8.5].

No, not always, but resistance is a significant and growing problem. Ciprofloxacin can still be effective against some strains, but high resistance rates, particularly in urinary tract infections, mean susceptibility testing is crucial [1.2.2].

The main mechanisms are mutations in the target bacterial enzymes (DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV) and reduced drug concentration inside the cell due to efflux pumps that actively remove the antibiotic [1.2.1].

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.