Skip to content

What are the different types of immunotoxins?

5 min read

In 2018, the FDA approved moxetumomab pasudotox, a recombinant immunotoxin for relapsed or refractory hairy cell leukemia. Understanding what are the different types of immunotoxins is crucial for appreciating the evolution and power of this targeted cancer therapy.

Quick Summary

Immunotoxins are categorized based on their toxic payload's origin (bacterial, plant, human) and manufacturing process (chemical or recombinant fusion). They selectively deliver toxins to target cancer cells.

Key Points

  • Classification Basis: Immunotoxin types are classified by their construction method (recombinant vs. chemical) and the origin of their toxic component (bacterial, plant, or human).

  • Recombinant Immunotoxins: Modern recombinant immunotoxins offer improved specificity, homogeneity, and reduced side effects compared to older chemical conjugates through advanced genetic engineering.

  • Bacterial vs. Plant Toxins: Common bacterial toxins like PE and DT inhibit protein synthesis by targeting eEF2, while plant-based ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs) like ricin A chain damage ribosomes.

  • Immunogenicity Challenges: A significant historical challenge for immunotoxins, particularly those with bacterial components, is immunogenicity, which can limit repeat treatments due to neutralizing antibodies.

  • ADCs vs. Immunotoxins: Immunotoxins use potent protein toxins, whereas antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) utilize smaller chemical payloads, leading to differences in mechanism and immunogenicity.

  • FDA Approval: The FDA-approved moxetumomab pasudotox, a recombinant immunotoxin targeting CD22, demonstrates the clinical viability of this therapy, especially in hematological cancers.

In This Article

What is an Immunotoxin?

An immunotoxin is a type of targeted therapy that uses a targeted binding domain, like an antibody, linked to a highly potent cytotoxic agent or toxin. The primary goal of an immunotoxin is to deliver the toxin directly to specific, typically diseased, cells while minimizing harm to healthy tissue. Upon binding to the target cell's surface, the immunotoxin is internalized, and the toxin component is released into the cytosol, where it works to induce cell death, often through the inhibition of protein synthesis.

Immunotoxins are classified in several ways, most commonly by their manufacturing method and the origin of their toxic component. This classification helps in understanding their characteristics, advantages, and drawbacks.

Classification by Manufacturing Method

The development of immunotoxins has progressed significantly over the decades, leading to a classification based on their production method.

Chemically Conjugated Immunotoxins

Chemically conjugated immunotoxins, often referred to as first-generation or second-generation, are created by chemically linking a toxin to an antibody.

  • First-generation: These involved conjugating a whole antibody to a whole or a catalytic subunit of a toxin. They were often heterogeneous, resulting in variability in the number of toxin molecules per antibody and inconsistent efficacy and toxicity. The use of whole antibodies also meant potential host immunogenicity against the foreign antibody component.
  • Second-generation: These improved upon the first by using antibody fragments, which generally have better tumor penetration and pharmacokinetics. However, they were still produced via chemical linking, retaining many of the heterogeneity and immunogenicity issues.

Recombinant Immunotoxins

Recombinant immunotoxins (RITs) are a significant advancement, constructed using genetic engineering techniques. A DNA sequence encoding an antibody fragment (often a single-chain variable fragment, or scFv) is fused with a DNA sequence for a truncated, modified toxin. The resulting fusion protein is then produced in a host, such as E. coli.

Key features of RITs include:

  • Homogeneity: They are highly uniform in their structure and composition, leading to more predictable pharmacological properties.
  • Specificity: Using engineered antibody fragments (e.g., scFv) enhances specific binding to the target antigen.
  • Tunability: Genetic engineering allows for modifications to reduce immunogenicity, improve stability, and alter the cytotoxic potency.
  • Examples: Denileukin diftitox (historical, DT-based) and Moxetumomab pasudotox (approved, PE-based) are prominent examples of RITs.

Classification by Toxin Origin

Another major classification is based on the source of the cytotoxic payload.

Bacterial Toxins

These are derived from potent bacterial proteins and are engineered for safe and targeted delivery. The most commonly used include:

  • Pseudomonas exotoxin A (PE): A highly potent toxin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Domains responsible for native receptor binding are removed, and a domain is added to facilitate targeting. Truncated versions like PE38 and PE24 are frequently used. PE inactivates eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) via ADP-ribosylation, halting protein synthesis and causing cell death.
  • Diphtheria Toxin (DT): Produced by Corynebacterium diphtheriae, DT also functions by ADP-ribosylating eEF2. The targeting domain is removed, and the catalytic domain is used in immunotoxin constructs. Denileukin diftitox is a DT-based example.

Plant Toxins

These come from various plant species and typically function as ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs), halting protein synthesis by damaging ribosomal RNA.

  • Ricin A chain (RTA): Derived from the castor bean (Ricinus communis), the A chain is the cytotoxic component. The native binding chain is removed to reduce systemic toxicity.
  • Gelonin: A RIP from the plant Gelonium multiflorum. It is a single-chain protein, simplifying its use in immunotoxin construction.
  • Saporin: A RIP derived from the soapwort plant (Saponaria officinalis).

Human Toxins

One of the most recent advancements involves using human-derived proteins to reduce the immunogenicity associated with bacterial and plant toxins.

  • Ribonucleases (RNases): Human pancreatic RNase is one example that can be engineered into immunotoxins. Its smaller size and lower immunogenicity offer advantages.
  • Granzyme B (GrB): A serine protease involved in apoptosis within the human immune system. GrB-based immunotoxins can initiate programmed cell death in target cells.

Challenges and Advances in Immunotoxin Therapy

Developing effective immunotoxins has faced several challenges, most notably immunogenicity and off-target toxicities.

  • Immunogenicity: The foreign nature of bacterial and plant toxins can provoke a strong immune response in patients, leading to the development of neutralizing antibodies. This can limit the effectiveness of repeat treatments. Strategies to overcome this include de-immunizing the toxin (mutating immunogenic epitopes) and combining therapy with immunosuppressive agents.
  • Vascular Leak Syndrome (VLS): A significant dose-limiting toxicity for some immunotoxins, VLS results from damage to endothelial cells. Modern engineering of the toxin component, including deletion of specific domains, has helped reduce this effect.

Immunotoxins vs. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs)

While both are antibody-based targeted therapies, immunotoxins and ADCs differ fundamentally in their toxic payload and manufacturing.

Feature Immunotoxins Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs)
Payload Large protein toxins (e.g., PE, Ricin A, RNases). Small-molecule cytotoxic drugs (e.g., auristatins, maytansinoids).
Structure Recombinant protein fusion or chemically conjugated protein. Antibody chemically linked to a small-molecule drug via a chemical linker.
Mechanism Inhibits protein synthesis (eEF2 inactivation or ribosomal damage). Varies, but often targets cell cycle or DNA, e.g., microtubule disruption.
Immunogenicity Can be highly immunogenic, especially bacterial toxins, though reduced in modern designs. Generally lower than protein-based immunotoxins, though immunogenicity can still occur against the antibody or drug.
Production Primarily recombinant expression in bacteria, followed by purification. Chemical synthesis and conjugation after antibody production.
Toxicity Profile Potential for specific toxicities like vascular leak syndrome. Potential for off-target toxicity if the linker is unstable, releasing the payload prematurely.

Conclusion

Immunotoxins have evolved significantly from their early, chemically-conjugated forms to highly specific and potent recombinant versions. The different types, classified by their construction and toxin origin, each offer unique advantages and challenges. While bacterial and plant toxins offer extreme potency, they come with the hurdle of immunogenicity. The emergence of human-derived toxins represents a promising path toward less immunogenic, repeatable treatments. The success of agents like moxetumomab pasudotox showcases the potential for immunotoxins in treating specific malignancies. As research continues to refine engineering strategies, address challenges like immunogenicity and vascular leak syndrome, and explore new toxin and targeting moieties, immunotoxins are poised to become an increasingly important class of targeted cancer therapy. For more in-depth scientific reviews on immunotoxin therapy, reputable sources like the National Institutes of Health provide comprehensive overviews.

Frequently Asked Questions

The three main components are a targeting moiety, typically a monoclonal antibody or fragment; a cytotoxic agent (toxin), which can be bacterial, plant, or human-derived; and a linker, which joins the two components.

Chemically conjugated immunotoxins are produced by chemically linking components and often suffer from heterogeneity. Recombinant immunotoxins are single, uniform fusion proteins produced using genetic engineering, which allows for greater control over structure and function.

Two of the most common examples are Pseudomonas exotoxin A (PE) and Diphtheria Toxin (DT). In immunotoxins, genetically modified fragments of these toxins are used to prevent non-specific binding while maintaining their potent cytotoxicity.

The foreign nature of many bacterial and plant-derived toxins can trigger a host immune response, leading to the development of neutralizing antibodies. These antibodies can render the immunotoxin ineffective upon subsequent treatments.

The main difference lies in the cytotoxic payload: immunotoxins use large protein toxins, while ADCs use smaller chemical drugs. This leads to differences in their mechanism of action, potential for immunogenicity, and manufacturing process.

Yes, moxetumomab pasudotox (Lumoxiti), a recombinant immunotoxin targeting CD22, was approved by the FDA in 2018 for certain types of hairy cell leukemia. However, production for the US market was later discontinued.

VLS is a significant side effect of some immunotoxins caused by damage to endothelial cells, leading to fluid leakage from capillaries. It is addressed through modifications to the toxin component to reduce off-target binding and by providing supportive care like steroids and intravenous fluids during treatment.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.