Skip to content

What Can Be Used Instead of Sugammadex? Alternatives for Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal

3 min read

Before the approval of sugammadex in 2015, anticholinesterase medications like neostigmine were the standard for reversing neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiologists exploring what can be used instead of sugammadex can consider these older, well-established agents, which operate via a different mechanism and possess distinct clinical characteristics.

Quick Summary

This article discusses alternatives for reversing neuromuscular blockade, focusing on neostigmine and other strategies. It compares the efficacy, safety, and cost of these options relative to sugammadex, covering different blocking agents and levels of paralysis.

Key Points

  • Primary Alternative: The main pharmacologic alternative to sugammadex for reversing neuromuscular blockade is neostigmine, which is an anticholinesterase agent.

  • Neostigmine's Mechanism: Neostigmine works by inhibiting the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, increasing acetylcholine concentration at the neuromuscular junction to outcompete blocking agents.

  • Efficacy Limitations: Neostigmine can only reverse shallow-to-moderate neuromuscular blockade effectively, possessing a 'ceiling effect' that prevents reversal of deep blockade.

  • Side Effects: Neostigmine requires co-administration of an anticholinergic agent like glycopyrrolate to counteract undesirable muscarinic side effects such as bradycardia and increased salivation.

  • Cost and Speed: Neostigmine is significantly cheaper than sugammadex but has a slower onset of action.

  • Different NMBAs: Using benzylisoquinolinium NMBAs (e.g., cisatracurium) is another strategy, as their metabolism is independent of renal function, and they can be reversed with neostigmine.

  • Importance of Monitoring: Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is essential for guiding the appropriate use and timing of neostigmine to ensure adequate reversal and prevent residual paralysis.

In This Article

Neostigmine: The Traditional Reversal Agent

Neostigmine, an anticholinesterase agent, is the most common and longest-used alternative for reversing non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs). Its mechanism is fundamentally different from sugammadex, which encapsulates the blocking agent. Instead, neostigmine inhibits the acetylcholinesterase enzyme, which increases the concentration of acetylcholine (the neurotransmitter) at the neuromuscular junction. This increased acetylcholine concentration then outcompetes the NMBA for nicotinic receptors, allowing muscle contraction to be restored.

Critical Considerations for Neostigmine Use

  • Ceiling Effect: Neostigmine's efficacy is limited by a 'ceiling effect.' It is effective for reversing shallow-to-moderate neuromuscular blockade, but it cannot effectively reverse deep or profound blockade. In such cases, the recovery is dependent on the spontaneous metabolism of the blocking agent.
  • Muscarinic Side Effects: Neostigmine increases acetylcholine not only at the neuromuscular junction but also at muscarinic receptors throughout the body, which can lead to undesirable side effects. To counteract these, an antimuscarinic agent like glycopyrrolate or atropine must be co-administered with neostigmine.
  • Slower Onset: Neostigmine's onset of action is significantly slower than sugammadex. While sugammadex can reverse moderate paralysis in approximately 2 minutes, neostigmine can take up to 10-20 minutes, even with proper dosing and monitoring.

The Role of Neuromuscular Monitoring

Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is essential when using neostigmine to ensure adequate and safe reversal. A device measures the train-of-four (TOF) ratio, which helps the anesthetist determine the appropriate dose and timing for administration. Neostigmine should not be administered for reversal if the TOF count is too low, as it will be ineffective and could cause harm.

Comparison of Neostigmine and Sugammadex

Feature Neostigmine (with Glycopyrrolate) Sugammadex (Bridion)
Mechanism Inhibits acetylcholinesterase, increasing acetylcholine to outcompete NMBA. Encapsulates and inactivates rocuronium/vecuronium molecules.
Speed of Reversal Slower (peak effect ~10-20 mins). Very fast (moderate block reversal ~2 mins).
Depth of Reversal Effective for shallow-to-moderate blockade only; has a ceiling effect. Effective for deep and profound blockade.
NMBAs Reversed Broad-spectrum (Aminosteroids and Benzylisoquinolines). Specific for aminosteroid NMBAs (rocuronium, vecuronium).
Side Effects Muscarinic effects (e.g., bradycardia, salivation), mitigated by an anticholinergic. Potential for hypersensitivity reactions and impacts on hormonal contraception.
Co-medication Requires co-administration of an anticholinergic (glycopyrrolate) to prevent muscarinic side effects. No co-medication is required.
Cost Much lower drug acquisition cost. Significantly higher drug acquisition cost.

Other Strategies for Neuromuscular Blockade Management

Beyond neostigmine, other approaches can be used based on the specific clinical context:

  • Using Benzylisoquinolinium NMBAs: NMBAs like atracurium and cisatracurium are metabolized independently of renal and hepatic function (via Hofmann elimination and plasma esterases). This can be a favorable strategy in patients with kidney or liver impairment, and reversal can still be achieved with neostigmine.
  • Allowing Spontaneous Recovery: For cases involving shorter-acting NMBAs or when the clinical timeline permits, simply waiting for the drug to be metabolized and eliminated can be a valid approach. However, this relies on a reliable assessment of recovery to prevent residual paralysis.
  • Succinylcholine for Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI): For RSI where rapid paralysis and offset are needed, succinylcholine remains a viable option, particularly where sugammadex might be contraindicated or unavailable. It has a very rapid onset and offset, and its effects are terminated by plasma cholinesterase.

Future and Emerging Alternatives

The search for novel reversal agents continues, with several compounds under investigation that could offer broader compatibility or improved safety profiles. These include:

  • Calabadions: Synthetic molecular containers that can reverse both aminosteroidal and benzylisoquinolinium NMBAs.
  • Adamgammadex: A modified γ-cyclodextrin with improved binding properties and reduced hypersensitivity risks compared to sugammadex.
  • L-cysteine adduction: A method for reversing ultrashort-acting NMBAs by accelerating metabolism.

Conclusion

While sugammadex offers a rapid, predictable, and effective reversal for aminosteroid NMBAs, especially from deep blockade, several viable alternatives and strategies exist for scenarios where it is unavailable, contraindicated, or cost-prohibitive. The primary alternative, neostigmine (co-administered with glycopyrrolate), remains a standard for reversing shallow-to-moderate blockade. The choice of what can be used instead of sugammadex depends on the specific clinical context, including the NMBA used, the depth of blockade, patient comorbidities, and institutional resources. Crucially, regardless of the reversal agent chosen, modern anesthesia practice necessitates quantitative neuromuscular monitoring to ensure patient safety and prevent residual paralysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main alternative to sugammadex is neostigmine, an anticholinesterase agent that is typically administered with an anticholinergic like glycopyrrolate.

Neostigmine inhibits the enzyme that breaks down acetylcholine, increasing its availability to reverse the block. In contrast, sugammadex works by encapsulating the neuromuscular blocking drug itself, rendering it inactive.

No, neostigmine has a 'ceiling effect' and is not effective for reversing deep or profound neuromuscular blockade. It is typically only used for shallow-to-moderate levels of paralysis.

Sugammadex works through direct encapsulation, providing a more immediate and complete reversal of rocuronium or vecuronium at any depth of blockade. Neostigmine’s indirect mechanism takes longer and is less effective at deeper levels.

Neostigmine can cause muscarinic side effects like bradycardia and increased salivation. These are managed by co-administering an anticholinergic agent, such as glycopyrrolate, at the same time as neostigmine.

Yes, agents like cisatracurium and atracurium are benzylisoquinolinium NMBAs. Their metabolism is independent of kidney or liver function and they can be reversed with neostigmine.

The cost-effectiveness of sugammadex depends on the clinical scenario. While the drug is expensive, its use can reduce operating room time and decrease postoperative pulmonary complications, potentially offering overall cost savings in some cases.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.