Skip to content

What Is the Alternative to Dysport? Exploring Neurotoxin & Non-Injectable Options

5 min read

While Dysport is a popular and effective choice for treating dynamic wrinkles, many patients seek to understand what is the alternative to Dysport before deciding on their treatment plan. This exploration is often driven by a desire for different properties, such as duration, onset, or formulation, as each botulinum toxin has unique characteristics.

Quick Summary

Alternatives to Dysport include other botulinum toxin brands like Botox, Xeomin, Daxxify, and Jeuveau, which differ in onset, duration, and protein structure. Non-neurotoxin options such as dermal fillers and chemical peels also exist for treating wrinkles and fine lines.

Key Points

  • Botox offers a reliable alternative to Dysport: As the market leader, Botox is a well-established neurotoxin known for its precision and reliability, making it ideal for targeted, smaller areas.

  • Xeomin is a purified, "naked" neurotoxin: Free of complexing proteins, Xeomin is a suitable option for patients who have developed resistance to other neurotoxins over time.

  • Daxxify provides the longest-lasting results: Using a unique peptide-based formulation, Daxxify's effects can last up to 6-9 months, significantly longer than other botulinum toxins.

  • Jeuveau offers an alternative focused on aesthetics: Specifically designed for cosmetic use, Jeuveau provides precise, localized results for areas like frown lines.

  • Non-injectable options exist for different needs: For those avoiding injections, treatments like dermal fillers, chemical peels, and microcurrent facials can address static wrinkles, volume loss, and skin texture.

  • Choosing the right alternative requires professional consultation: The ideal choice depends on individual goals, desired duration, and sensitivities, and should always be made in consultation with a qualified provider.

In This Article

Understanding the Landscape of Botulinum Toxin Alternatives

Dysport is an injectable neurotoxin that uses a form of botulinum toxin type A (abobotulinumtoxinA) to temporarily relax the muscles responsible for dynamic wrinkles. However, it is far from the only option on the market. Several other FDA-approved neurotoxins provide similar results, each with unique properties that may make it a more suitable choice for specific aesthetic goals or patient profiles. Understanding the nuances of these alternatives is crucial for making an informed decision with your healthcare provider.

Botox (OnabotulinumtoxinA): The Market Leader

Botox is perhaps the most famous and widely used neurotoxin, offering a reliable and time-tested option for wrinkle reduction. It contains onabotulinumtoxinA, a form of botulinum toxin similar to Dysport, but its formulation and diffusion are different. Botox has a larger protein complex, leading to a more localized effect with less spread from the injection site. This characteristic makes it well-suited for treating smaller, more precise areas like crow's feet or specific frown lines. Its onset is typically slower than Dysport, with results appearing in 5 to 7 days, though its duration of effect is generally comparable at 3 to 4 months.

Xeomin (IncobotulinumtoxinA): The "Naked" Toxin

Often called the "naked" injectable, Xeomin is a highly purified form of botulinum toxin without the accessory proteins found in Botox and Dysport. This unique formulation can be advantageous for several reasons. First, it potentially reduces the risk of developing antibody resistance over time, which can occur in a small percentage of long-term users of other neurotoxins. Second, its concentrated effect, with less spread than Dysport, makes it an excellent choice for targeting fine lines with precision. Xeomin's onset is generally similar to Botox (5-7 days), and its duration typically lasts 3 to 4 months, though some users report a slightly longer effect.

Daxxify (DaxibotulinumtoxinA): The Long-Lasting Option

Daxxify is the newest FDA-approved botulinum toxin, distinguished by its significantly longer-lasting results. It is the only neurotoxin to use a peptide-based stabilizer instead of animal-derived proteins. This innovation allows Daxxify's effects to last up to 6 to 9 months for some patients, offering a compelling alternative for those who want fewer maintenance appointments. While the initial per-unit cost may be higher, the extended duration can make the annual cost comparable to or even less than other options. Daxxify's onset is also notably quick, with some patients seeing results within 1 to 2 days.

Jeuveau (PrabotulinumtoxinA): The Aesthetic-Focused Toxin

Jeuveau is a botulinum toxin specifically approved for cosmetic use, often marketed as "Newtox". It is comparable to Dysport and Botox in terms of safety and efficacy for treating dynamic wrinkles, particularly frown lines. Jeuveau's formulation offers a more localized effect than Dysport's wider spread, making it ideal for targeted treatments. Its onset is quick, often within 24 to 48 hours, and its effects generally last between 3 and 6 months. Jeuveau is sometimes presented as a more budget-friendly option compared to the more established brands.

Beyond Neurotoxins: Non-Injectable Alternatives

For those who prefer to avoid neurotoxin injections entirely or seek alternative ways to address wrinkles and skin aging, several non-injectable options are available.

  • Dermal Fillers: Unlike neurotoxins that relax muscles, dermal fillers work by adding volume beneath the skin to smooth out static wrinkles and restore lost volume. Fillers are often made from hyaluronic acid and can address different areas of concern than neurotoxins. Fillers and neurotoxins can also be used in combination for comprehensive facial rejuvenation.
  • Chemical Peels: These treatments use a chemical solution to exfoliate the top layers of skin, revealing a smoother, more radiant complexion. Chemical peels can reduce the appearance of fine lines, sun damage, and uneven skin tone, providing a different approach to skin renewal.
  • Microcurrent Facials: Using low-level electrical currents, these non-invasive treatments stimulate facial muscles to improve tone and contour. While the results are often more subtle than injectables, they offer a gentle alternative for those seeking a non-chemical approach.

Comparison of Dysport and Its Alternatives

Feature Dysport Botox Xeomin Daxxify Jeuveau
Active Ingredient AbobotulinumtoxinA OnabotulinumtoxinA IncobotulinumtoxinA DaxibotulinumtoxinA PrabotulinumtoxinA
Protein Structure Contains accessory proteins (milk allergen) Contains accessory proteins Pure, "naked" toxin (no proteins) Peptide-stabilized Contains accessory proteins
Onset 2–3 days 5–7 days 5–7 days 1–2 days 1–2 days
Duration 3–4 months 3–4 months 3–4 months (possibly longer) 6–9 months 3–6 months
Spread Wider spread (good for large areas) More localized (good for precise areas) Most localized Intermediate spread Localized
Best For Large areas like forehead Precise areas like crow's feet Patients with resistance or allergies Long-lasting results Precise, aesthetic-focused results
Cost Average per unit Average per unit Less expensive per treatment, but more units needed Higher per treatment, but fewer visits Often more budget-friendly

How to Choose the Right Alternative

Choosing the ideal alternative to Dysport depends on your specific aesthetic goals, preferences, and physiological response. Factors to consider include:

  • Target Area: Do you need treatment for a larger area like the forehead, or a smaller, more precise area like crow's feet? The diffusion properties of each neurotoxin play a key role here.
  • Desired Duration: How frequently are you willing to receive treatments? Daxxify's longer-lasting effects might be preferable if you want to minimize visits, while a shorter-duration option may be better for first-time users or those who prefer more flexibility.
  • Formulation & Sensitivities: If you have allergies to milk protein, you should avoid Dysport. Patients who have developed a resistance to other toxins may benefit from Xeomin's pure formulation.
  • Cost vs. Convenience: Consider both the per-unit cost and the total annual cost based on the treatment's duration. Daxxify's higher price per treatment might be offset by needing fewer sessions per year.

Ultimately, the best approach is to consult with a qualified dermatologist or medical aesthetician. They can assess your needs, discuss your options in detail, and recommend the most suitable product for your desired outcome.


For more detailed information on botulinum toxins and their applications, you can consult authoritative medical resources, such as those available through the National Institutes of Health.

Conclusion

Dysport is a highly effective treatment for dynamic wrinkles, but it's not the only option available. Alternatives like Botox, Xeomin, Daxxify, and Jeuveau offer different benefits in terms of onset, duration, and formulation. For example, Daxxify provides a longer-lasting effect, while Xeomin's purified formula is ideal for patients with sensitivities. Non-injectable treatments such as dermal fillers and chemical peels also present viable options for addressing signs of aging. The best choice is a personal one, best made after a detailed discussion with a healthcare professional who can align the right product with your unique needs and expectations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Dysport has a smaller protein molecule size, which causes it to spread more widely and typically have a faster onset of 2-3 days. Botox has a larger protein complex, resulting in a more localized effect and a slower onset of 5-7 days.

Daxxify is currently the longest-lasting neurotoxin available, with results lasting 6 to 9 months for many patients, compared to the typical 3-4 months for Dysport and Botox.

Xeomin is a purified form of botulinum toxin with no accessory proteins. This makes it a good option for patients who may have developed antibody resistance to the complexing proteins found in Botox and Dysport.

Yes, it is common and safe to switch between different neurotoxins like Dysport, Botox, Xeomin, and Jeuveau, as they all use botulinum toxin type A but have slight variations in formulation.

Patients with a milk allergy should avoid Dysport because it contains a lactose protein. Alternatives like Xeomin, which does not contain complexing proteins, are often recommended.

While Daxxify has a higher cost per treatment, its significantly longer duration of effect means fewer sessions per year. This can make the annual expense comparable to or even more cost-effective than other options.

Non-neurotoxin alternatives include dermal fillers for volume loss and static wrinkles, chemical peels for skin rejuvenation, and microcurrent facials for muscle toning and contouring.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.