Skip to content

What is the rule of 2 in steroids? Understanding the Historical Guideline

4 min read

For decades, a guideline known as the "Rule of Twos" was used by healthcare providers, particularly in dentistry, to assess a patient's risk of adrenal suppression from corticosteroid use. This rule, however, is now considered an oversimplification, and clinicians rely on more nuanced, evidence-based guidelines.

Quick Summary

The historical Rule of 2 in steroids assessed adrenal suppression risk based on daily dose, duration, and recency of cortisone use. This guideline is now outdated, replaced by modern protocols emphasizing individualized patient risk assessment and monitoring the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Key Points

  • Historical Context: The Rule of 2 was an outdated guideline for assessing the risk of adrenal suppression in patients using corticosteroids.

  • Rule's Criteria: The rule involved a patient taking 20 mg of cortisone daily for at least 2 weeks within the past 2 years of a stressful event.

  • Underlying Physiology: The risk of adrenal suppression arises from exogenous steroid use inhibiting the body's natural cortisol production by suppressing the HPA axis.

  • Modern Practice: Current medical practice uses more complex, individualized assessments based on total dose, duration, and patient-specific factors, replacing the old rule.

  • Importance of Tapering: Abruptly stopping steroids after long-term use is dangerous. Gradual tapering is necessary to allow the adrenal glands to recover.

  • Stress Dosing: During major physical stress like surgery, patients with HPA axis suppression may require supplemental steroid doses, a practice known as stress dosing.

  • Patient Safety: Modern guidelines emphasize patient education and carrying emergency information to prevent adrenal crises.

In This Article

The Historical Rule of 2 Explained

The Rule of Twos was a clinical rule of thumb used primarily by dental practitioners and other healthcare providers to identify patients at risk of adrenal suppression due to corticosteroid therapy. The rule stated that adrenal suppression could occur if a patient took a specific dose of cortisone or its equivalent under certain conditions:

  • Dose: At least 20 mg of cortisone (or its equivalent, such as 5 mg of prednisone) daily.
  • Duration: For at least two weeks.
  • Recency: Within two years of a stressful medical event, like a surgical or dental procedure.

The rationale behind this rule was that prolonged, high-dose exogenous steroid use could suppress the body's natural production of cortisol. In times of significant physical stress, the body requires a surge of cortisol. If a patient’s adrenal glands were suppressed, they might not be able to produce this necessary cortisol, potentially leading to a life-threatening adrenal crisis. The rule prompted clinicians to consider providing supplemental corticosteroids (known as 'stress dosing') for patients undergoing procedures.

The Physiology Behind Adrenal Suppression

To understand why the Rule of Twos was created, it is important to first understand how the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis functions. The HPA axis is a complex system involving the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and adrenal glands that regulates the body’s stress response.

  1. Hypothalamus: Releases corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH).
  2. Pituitary Gland: Stimulated by CRH to release adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH).
  3. Adrenal Glands: Triggered by ACTH to produce and release cortisol.

When a person takes exogenous steroids, like prednisone, the body's feedback loop perceives high levels of cortisol-like compounds. This signals the hypothalamus and pituitary to slow or halt their production of CRH and ACTH, respectively. Without the stimulating ACTH, the adrenal glands atrophy and cease natural cortisol production. This suppression is the core issue addressed by the historical Rule of Twos.

Why the Rule of 2 Is Outdated

While the Rule of Twos served as a simple reminder for adrenal suppression risk, it is no longer considered the standard of care for several key reasons:

  • Oversimplification: The rule is based on a specific dose and timeframe that does not account for the wide variability in patient responses. Some patients may experience HPA axis suppression with lower doses or shorter durations, while others may not experience it even after meeting the criteria.
  • Risk of Over-supplementation: Following a rigid rule can lead to the unnecessary supplementation of steroids. In some cases, providing supplemental steroids when not needed can increase a patient's risk of side effects, including hyperglycemia and immunosuppression.
  • Lack of Specificity: The rule applies to any stressful event within a two-year window, which is too broad and not supported by modern endocrinology guidelines. The duration of HPA axis suppression after discontinuing long-term steroid therapy varies significantly among individuals.

Modern Guidelines for Assessing Risk

Today, medical professionals rely on more nuanced and individualized assessments to determine the risk of adrenal suppression. These modern guidelines consider multiple factors, leading to safer and more effective patient care.

Current assessment criteria often include:

  • Total cumulative dose over time.
  • Duration of therapy (e.g., typically longer than 3-4 weeks for significant risk).
  • Individual patient factors, such as age, underlying conditions, and weight.
  • The specific type of glucocorticoid used and its potency.
  • Assessment of HPA axis function if withdrawal is planned after long-term therapy.

Managing Adrenal Suppression and Stress Dosing

For patients on long-term corticosteroid therapy, management strategies have moved beyond the Rule of Twos to a more personalized approach that prioritizes safe tapering and stress dosing when clinically necessary.

Key management strategies:

  • Gradual Tapering: After prolonged use, abrupt cessation of steroids is dangerous. Physicians implement a gradual tapering schedule, which allows the adrenal glands to slowly resume their normal function.
  • Stress Dosing: During times of acute physical stress, such as major surgery, severe infection, or significant trauma, patients with HPA axis suppression may require an increased dose of steroids. This is known as stress dosing and is determined on a case-by-case basis by an endocrinologist or a consulting physician.
  • Patient Education: Patients on chronic steroid therapy must be aware of the risks of adrenal suppression and instructed to carry an emergency identification card and medication.

Comparison of Old vs. New Adrenal Suppression Approaches

Feature Historical Rule of 2 Modern Clinical Guidelines
Basis for Risk Assessment Fixed dose (20mg cortisone), duration (2 weeks), and timeline (2 years). Individualized assessment based on cumulative dose, duration, type of steroid, and patient factors.
Clinical Application Primarily used in dentistry and minor surgical procedures to gauge the need for steroid cover. Used broadly across medical specialties to manage adrenal suppression risk for all types of procedures and stress.
Flexibility Rigid and formulaic, potentially leading to both under- and over-supplementation. Highly flexible, allowing for tailored dosing schedules and gradual tapering.
Risk of Adrenal Crisis Attempted to mitigate risk, but lacked the nuance to prevent all cases. Focuses on a comprehensive approach with careful tapering and stress dosing protocols to minimize risk.
Current Status Outdated and no longer recommended. Evidence-based and constantly refined through clinical research.

Conclusion

The Rule of Twos is a historical concept in pharmacology that highlights the critical risk of adrenal suppression associated with long-term steroid use. While it once served as a simple heuristic for clinicians, particularly in dental contexts, it has since been superseded by more comprehensive and individualized modern guidelines. The current standard of care emphasizes a patient-specific approach that accounts for the cumulative dose, duration, and specific steroid type, along with careful monitoring and tapering strategies. As with any powerful medication, the use of steroids requires careful consideration and adherence to the latest clinical recommendations to ensure patient safety and optimize outcomes.

For additional information on glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency, refer to the Endocrine Society's clinical practice guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, the Rule of 2 is an outdated medical guideline and is no longer the standard of care for managing steroid-induced adrenal suppression. Modern clinical practice relies on more individualized patient assessments.

The Rule of 2 was created to address the risk of adrenal suppression, a condition where the body's natural cortisol production is suppressed due to prolonged steroid use. This could lead to an adrenal crisis during stressful events.

Modern guidelines are more comprehensive, considering factors like the specific steroid type, cumulative dose, and treatment duration, rather than relying on the rigid criteria of the Rule of 2. This leads to more precise risk assessment and patient management.

Adrenal suppression is the reduction or cessation of the adrenal glands' ability to produce cortisol. It occurs when exogenous steroids inhibit the HPA axis, signaling the body to stop its own cortisol production.

Stress dosing is the practice of temporarily increasing a patient's steroid dose during times of significant physical stress, such as major surgery or severe illness. It is needed for patients with HPA axis suppression to help their bodies cope with the increased demand for cortisol.

Common symptoms of adrenal insufficiency can include fatigue, weakness, low blood pressure, gastrointestinal issues like vomiting and abdominal pain, and muscle or joint pain.

No, abruptly stopping steroids after long-term therapy is unsafe and can trigger an adrenal crisis due to the body's suppressed cortisol production. Steroid doses must be gradually tapered under medical supervision.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.