Skip to content

What are the side effects of Bextra?

3 min read

On April 7, 2005, Pfizer withdrew the painkiller Bextra from the U.S. market at the request of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Understanding what are the side effects of Bextra is crucial to comprehending why this once-popular medication was removed.

Quick Summary

Bextra (valdecoxib) was withdrawn due to an unfavorable risk-benefit profile, primarily an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, and severe, sometimes fatal, skin conditions.

Key Points

  • Market Withdrawal: Bextra was withdrawn from the market in April 2005 at the FDA's request due to an unfavorable risk-benefit profile.

  • Cardiovascular Risks: A primary side effect was an increased risk of serious cardiovascular events, including heart attack and stroke.

  • Severe Skin Reactions: Bextra was linked to a higher rate of life-threatening skin reactions like Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) compared to other drugs in its class.

  • COX-2 Inhibitor Class: Bextra is a COX-2 inhibitor, a class of drugs that also included Vioxx (also withdrawn) and Celebrex (which remains available with strong warnings).

  • Post-Surgery Risk: Studies specifically found a significantly increased risk of heart attack and stroke when Bextra was used by patients recovering from heart bypass surgery.

  • FDA Action: The FDA mandated stronger "black box" warnings for all remaining prescription NSAIDs concerning cardiovascular and GI risks following the withdrawal of Bextra.

  • Common Side Effects: Less severe side effects included headache, indigestion, diarrhea, and fluid retention (edema).

In This Article

Introduction to Bextra (Valdecoxib)

Bextra, also known by its generic name valdecoxib, was a prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). It belonged to the COX-2 inhibitor class of NSAIDs, which included other drugs like Vioxx (rofecoxib) and Celebrex (celecoxib). These medications were developed to treat pain and inflammation in conditions such as osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, aiming to be gentler on the stomach than traditional NSAIDs. Bextra was eventually withdrawn from the market due to significant safety concerns.

The Dual Dangers: Cardiovascular and Skin-Related Side Effects

The primary reasons for Bextra's withdrawal were serious cardiovascular events and severe skin reactions. The FDA determined that Bextra's risks outweighed its benefits, leading to its removal from the market.

Cardiovascular Risks: Heart Attack and Stroke

Studies indicated that Bextra was associated with an elevated risk of heart attack and stroke. Data presented to the American Heart Association showed that patients taking Bextra after heart surgery had a higher likelihood of experiencing a stroke or heart attack compared to those on a placebo. Another study involving patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery also found a link between valdecoxib and its related intravenous drug, parecoxib, and an increased incidence of cardiovascular events. The FDA specifically noted the increased cardiovascular risk observed in short-term CABG trials as a key factor in the withdrawal, suggesting the risk could extend to long-term use. This issue contributed to a broader review of all COX-2 inhibitors, which began after Vioxx was voluntarily removed from the market due to similar cardiovascular concerns.

Severe Skin Reactions

A notable risk linked to Bextra was the potential for rare but serious and sometimes fatal skin conditions. These included:

  • Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS): A severe disorder characterized by flu-like symptoms followed by a painful rash that spreads and blisters.
  • Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN): A more severe form of SJS where the outer layer of skin peels off, often requiring intensive care and carrying a high mortality rate.
  • Erythema Multiforme (EM): A skin reaction that can be triggered by various factors, including medications.

The FDA observed that the reporting rate for these severe skin reactions appeared to be higher with Bextra than with other COX-2 inhibitors. These reactions could occur at any point during treatment. Although valdecoxib contains a sulfonamide component, increasing the risk for individuals with sulfa allergies, these reactions could still occur in patients without such allergies.

Common and Other Reported Side Effects

In addition to the serious risks leading to its withdrawal, Bextra was also associated with more common NSAID side effects. These included gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain, indigestion, nausea, and diarrhea. Other reported side effects included headache, dizziness, fluid retention (edema), rapid weight gain, high blood pressure, and potential kidney problems, as well as risks of GI bleeding, ulceration, and perforation.

Bextra in Comparison to Other NSAIDs

Bextra's safety profile was evaluated alongside other drugs in its class. Here is a comparison of Bextra with other COX-2 inhibitors and traditional NSAIDs:

Feature Bextra (Valdecoxib) Vioxx (Rofecoxib) Celebrex (Celecoxib) Traditional NSAIDs (e.g., Ibuprofen)
Status Withdrawn from market Withdrawn from market Available with warnings Widely available (OTC & Rx)
Primary Reason for Concern Cardiovascular risk & severe skin reactions Cardiovascular risk (heart attack, stroke) Cardiovascular risk Gastrointestinal bleeding & ulcers
Specific Risk Highlighted Higher rate of severe skin reactions (SJS/TEN) compared to other COX-2s Doubled risk of heart attack/stroke in long-term use study Considered to have intermediate cardiovascular risk Lower cardiovascular risk at OTC doses but high GI risk

Following Bextra's withdrawal, the FDA required that all prescription NSAIDs, including Celebrex, include a "black box" warning about potential cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks.

Conclusion

Bextra's case highlights the importance of ongoing drug safety monitoring. Despite being intended as a safer pain relief option, serious side effects emerged after Bextra was widely used, including increased risks of heart attack, stroke, and particularly severe skin reactions. Its withdrawal, along with that of Vioxx, significantly influenced regulatory and medical perspectives on NSAID safety {Link: ScienceDirect https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/valdecoxib}.


Authoritative Link: {Link: NBC News https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fda-public-health-advisory-cox-2-drugs-flna1c9443811}

Frequently Asked Questions

Bextra was taken off the market at the request of the FDA due to an increased risk of serious cardiovascular events like heart attack and stroke, as well as a risk of rare but fatal skin reactions.

Bextra (valdecoxib) was a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) belonging to a specific class called COX-2 inhibitors, intended to treat arthritis and other pain.

They are rare, severe, and life-threatening skin reactions that were linked to Bextra. They cause the skin to blister and peel, and can lead to death. The reported rate for these events was higher for Bextra than for similar drugs.

No. Another COX-2 inhibitor, Vioxx, was withdrawn from the market for similar cardiovascular risks. While Celebrex (another COX-2 inhibitor) remains on the market, it carries a strong warning about potential cardiovascular risks.

The most serious side effects were an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, and severe skin conditions, including Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, which can be fatal.

Yes, common side effects included headache, diarrhea, indigestion, nausea, and abdominal pain.

Following Bextra's withdrawal, the FDA required all prescription NSAIDs to include a "black box" warning about the potential for increased cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risks to better inform patients and doctors.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.