Skip to content

What is the classification of drug targeting?

4 min read

In some cases, targeted therapy can be up to 80% effective, a significant increase over the approximate 30% success rate of traditional chemotherapy [1.7.2, 1.7.1]. Understanding what is the classification of drug targeting is key to this improved efficacy, as it allows for the precise delivery of medication to diseased tissues while sparing healthy ones [1.2.1].

Quick Summary

This overview details the classification of drug targeting. It explains the primary strategies, including passive, active, and physical targeting, and different levels of specificity from organ to intracellular levels.

Key Points

  • Main Classifications: Drug targeting is primarily classified into active, passive, and physical targeting strategies [1.2.4].

  • Passive Targeting: Relies on the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect for drug accumulation in sites like tumors [1.2.5].

  • Active Targeting: Uses ligands (e.g., antibodies) to bind to specific receptors on target cells for highly specific delivery [1.2.4].

  • Physical Targeting: Employs external stimuli like ultrasound or magnetic fields to trigger drug release at a specific location [1.2.4].

  • Levels of Specificity: Targeting can occur at different orders: first-order (organ), second-order (cell type), and third-order (intracellular) [1.2.2].

  • Carrier Systems: A variety of nanocarriers like liposomes, nanoparticles, and dendrimers are used to transport drugs [1.5.5].

  • Goal of Targeting: The primary aim is to increase drug efficacy at the target site while reducing side effects on healthy tissues [1.2.1].

In This Article

Introduction to Targeted Drug Delivery

Targeted drug delivery is a sophisticated method designed to concentrate a medication in a specific area of the body, such as a tumor or inflamed tissue, while minimizing its concentration in other, healthy tissues [1.2.1]. The fundamental goal is to improve the therapeutic efficacy of a drug and reduce its potential side effects [1.2.1]. This approach contrasts with conventional drug administration, where a medication is distributed throughout the body, often affecting non-target cells and causing undesirable side effects. The design of any targeted system must consider the drug's properties, the target site, and the specific disease being treated [1.2.1]. Over 50 products based on this technology have received FDA approval, primarily for drugs with high toxicity or low water solubility, to enhance their safety and effectiveness [1.2.4].

Main Classifications of Drug Targeting

Drug targeting strategies are broadly categorized into three main types: passive, active, and physical targeting [1.2.4].

Passive Targeting

Passive targeting relies on the natural (physicochemical) properties of the drug carrier and the anatomical features of the target tissue [1.2.4, 1.3.5]. It doesn't involve any specific molecular recognition. The most prominent example is the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect [1.2.5]. Tumor vasculature is often leaky and has poor lymphatic drainage compared to normal tissue [1.2.4]. This allows drug carriers, typically nanoparticles between 10 and 100 nanometers, to passively accumulate in the tumor microenvironment [1.2.1]. To prolong circulation time and avoid the body's immune system (the reticuloendothelial system or RES), these nanoparticles are often coated with substances like polyethylene glycol (PEG) [1.2.1].

Active Targeting

Active targeting is a more specific approach that builds upon passive targeting [1.2.1]. It uses targeting moieties, or ligands, on the surface of the drug carrier to bind to specific receptors that are overexpressed on the surface of target cells [1.2.4, 1.3.3]. This ligand-receptor interaction enhances the uptake of the drug into the specific cells, like a key fitting into a lock [1.3.4]. Common ligands include antibodies (as in antibody-drug conjugates or ADCs), peptides, and aptamers [1.2.4, 1.3.2]. For example, the ligand transferrin can be used to target tumor cells that have a high number of transferrin receptors on their surface [1.2.1]. This strategy increases the drug's concentration precisely where it's needed, improving its therapeutic ratio [1.3.3].

Physical Targeting

Physical targeting utilizes external stimuli to trigger drug release at a specific location [1.2.4]. This method offers a high degree of control over where and when the drug becomes active. Examples of external triggers include:

  • Ultrasound: High-frequency sound waves can be focused on a target tissue to cause the drug carrier (e.g., a micelle) to degrade and release its payload [1.2.4].
  • Magnetic Field: A drug can be loaded into a magnetic carrier. An external magnetic field can then guide these carriers to and hold them at the target site [1.2.4].
  • pH or Temperature Changes: Carriers can be designed from materials that are sensitive to changes in the local environment. Since tumors often have a more acidic (lower pH) environment than healthy tissues, pH-responsive carriers can be designed to release their drug specifically in the tumor microenvironment [1.2.1].

Levels of Drug Targeting

Beyond the main classifications, drug targeting can be described in terms of its level of specificity, often categorized into different "orders" [1.4.2].

  • First-Order Targeting: This refers to the delivery of a drug to a specific organ or tissue, such as the liver or the peritoneal cavity [1.4.3, 1.2.2].
  • Second-Order Targeting: This involves a higher level of specificity, targeting particular cell types within an organ or tissue. An example is distinguishing between cancerous cells and healthy cells within the same organ [1.4.3, 1.2.2].
  • Third-Order Targeting: This is the most precise level, aiming for delivery to a specific intracellular compartment within a target cell, such as the nucleus or lysosomes [1.4.3, 1.2.2].

Comparison of Targeting Strategies

Feature Passive Targeting Active Targeting
Mechanism Relies on carrier size and EPR effect [1.3.6]. Uses specific ligand-receptor binding [1.3.4].
Specificity Less specific; relies on tissue-level properties [1.3.6]. Highly specific; targets individual cells [1.3.6].
Complexity Simpler design and manufacturing [1.3.1]. More complex; requires ligand conjugation [1.3.2].
Example PEGylated liposomes accumulating in tumors via EPR effect [1.2.1]. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) binding to HER2 receptors on breast cancer cells [1.2.4].
Limitation Effectiveness depends on the presence of a robust EPR effect, which can be heterogeneous [1.2.4]. Potential for immunogenicity and off-target effects if the receptor is also present on healthy cells [1.3.2, 1.6.2].

Drug Carriers and Future Challenges

A variety of carriers, or delivery vehicles, are used to transport drugs. These must be biocompatible and biodegradable [1.5.5]. Common examples include:

  • Liposomes: Spherical vesicles made of lipid bilayers [1.5.2].
  • Polymeric Micelles: Formed from amphiphilic co-polymers [1.5.5].
  • Nanoparticles: Tiny particles made from polymers, lipids, or metals [1.5.3, 1.5.2].
  • Dendrimers: Polymer-based carriers with a branching, tree-like structure [1.5.5].

Despite its promise, targeted drug delivery faces significant challenges. These include overcoming biological barriers like the blood-brain barrier, the heterogeneity of tumors, the potential toxicity of nanocarriers, and the complexity and cost of manufacturing [1.6.3, 1.6.2]. The future of the field lies in developing more precise "theranostic" systems that combine diagnosis and therapy, engineering precision nanoparticles for personalized medicine, and potentially even creating nanorobots for digitally precise drug delivery [1.6.3].

Conclusion

The classification of drug targeting into passive, active, and physical strategies provides a framework for developing smarter, more effective medications. By leveraging different levels of targeting—from organs down to intracellular components—pharmacology aims to create "magic bullets" that act only on diseased sites. While significant hurdles remain, ongoing advancements in nanomedicine and carrier design continue to push the boundaries of what's possible, promising a future of more personalized and effective treatments with fewer side effects. For further reading, an excellent resource is Wikipedia's page on Targeted Drug Delivery [1.2.1].

Frequently Asked Questions

The two main kinds of targeted drug delivery are active targeting, which uses ligands to bind to specific cell receptors, and passive targeting, which relies on the natural accumulation of drug carriers in diseased tissue due to effects like enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) [1.2.1].

Passive targeting uses the physicochemical properties of a drug carrier and the characteristics of the tissue (like leaky blood vessels in tumors) to accumulate the drug [1.2.4]. Active targeting adds a layer of specificity by using ligands on the carrier's surface to bind directly to receptors on target cells [1.3.4].

The Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect describes how the leaky blood vessels and poor lymphatic drainage in tumors allow nanoparticles and macromolecules to accumulate and be retained in the tumor tissue more than in healthy tissue [1.2.5].

A common example of active targeting is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). An ADC uses an antibody designed to recognize and bind to a specific antigen (protein) on the surface of cancer cells, delivering a potent drug directly to those cells [1.2.4].

Drug targeting is often described in three levels of increasing precision: first-order (targeting a specific organ), second-order (targeting a specific cell type within that organ), and third-order (targeting a specific location inside a cell, like the nucleus) [1.4.3, 1.2.2].

Common drug carriers include liposomes, polymeric micelles, dendrimers, and various types of nanoparticles (e.g., polymer-based, lipid-based, or metallic) [1.5.5, 1.5.6].

Major challenges include overcoming biological barriers (like the blood-brain barrier), tumor heterogeneity, potential toxicity of the delivery systems, and the high cost and complexity of manufacturing and scaling up these advanced therapies [1.6.3, 1.6.2].

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice.