The FDA's OTC Drug Review and Cascara Sagrada
Cascara sagrada, sourced from the Rhamnus purshiana shrub's dried bark, was historically a widely used OTC laxative in the U.S.. Its active compounds, anthraquinones, work by stimulating intestinal contractions and reducing water and electrolyte reabsorption. The FDA's decision to ban cascara sagrada from OTC products was part of a broader review of non-prescription drugs initiated in the 1970s to classify ingredients based on safety and efficacy. By the mid-1990s, cascara sagrada was categorized as needing more data.
The Critical Lack of Manufacturer Data
A key turning point occurred in 1998 when the FDA requested genotoxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity data for cascara sagrada. Unlike manufacturers of other laxative ingredients, those producing cascara sagrada did not submit the necessary evidence. This failure to provide data demonstrating safety, particularly regarding long-term use and potential risks, led to the FDA's final rule. In May 2002, the FDA declared cascara sagrada and aloe ingredients not generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE) and required their removal from OTC laxative products within 180 days.
Health Concerns Driving the Regulatory Action
The FDA's decision was influenced by several health concerns, especially with prolonged use. While effective short-term, long-term use risks included electrolyte imbalance (particularly low potassium), which can affect heart function. Chronic use could also lead to cathartic colon, a condition where the colon becomes dependent on laxatives. Liver injury, though rare, has also been linked to cascara sagrada. Concerns about potential carcinogenicity, based on studies of anthraquinones and a lack of definitive human data, also played a role.
The Distinction Between OTC Drugs and Dietary Supplements
It is important to note that the FDA's ban specifically targeted cascara sagrada when marketed as an OTC drug. It remains available as a dietary supplement, which is subject to different, less stringent regulations. Supplements do not undergo the same level of safety and efficacy testing as drugs.
Comparison of Cascara Sagrada (Pre-2002) vs. Regulated Laxatives (Post-2002)
Feature | Cascara Sagrada (Pre-2002 OTC Drug) | Regulated Alternatives (e.g., Senna, Bisacodyl) |
---|---|---|
Regulatory Status | Originally recognized as GRASE; status revoked by FDA in 2002. | Currently recognized as GRASE for OTC laxative use. |
Manufacturer Data | Manufacturers failed to submit data proving safety and efficacy. | Manufacturers submitted data establishing general recognition of safety. |
Long-Term Use Risks | Dependence, cathartic colon, electrolyte imbalance, liver toxicity. | Potential for dependence and electrolyte imbalance with chronic misuse. |
Carcinogenicity Concerns | Unproven risk due to lack of data on anthraquinone components. | Manufacturers provided carcinogenicity data to address concerns. |
Current Availability | Banned from OTC drug products; available as dietary supplement. | Widely available as OTC laxatives and often in reformulated products. |
Conclusion
The FDA's ban on cascara sagrada in OTC drug products in 2002 was primarily due to the failure of manufacturers to provide sufficient scientific data to prove its safety and effectiveness. This action reinforces the principle that medical products must be scientifically validated before being marketed as drugs. While available as a supplement, the ban highlights potential risks associated with unproven remedies, especially with long-term use. Consumers should consult a healthcare professional before using any herbal supplement.